“all dogs came a common ancestor, with incredible built-in diversity,”
Built-in diversity, huh?
All those breeders thought they were choosing dogs to reinforce traits they chose, and reinforcing the better results again and again… but they were just getting dogs that were already programmed into the wolf?
But how did the dogs’ reproductive systems know what the breeder was looking for, so they could produce it? This makes no sense.
It’s like saying that all the pictures i took were built-in to the roll of film, they just happened to come out looking like what i had the camera pointed at…
But if diversity is build-in, why don’t purebred dogs spin off different breeds? Why don’t mutt’s have one or two purebreds in each litter?
“They use ambiguous thinking,”
As opposed to your wishful thinking.
“ and carefully ignore any term of faith/belief/religion.”
They’re trying to be clear, and specific. You guys leap on any ambiguous language and claim it’s a scam or worse.
“Evolution literalists”
What the fuck else is there? Eitehr evolution is the explanation for the biosphere or it is not.
“either do not want to know the facts, do not want to understand the facts or they want to ignore the facts.”
Except what you keep offering is questions, not answers.
You CLAIM there’s an upper limit to adaptation, short of speciation. But you never, ever, ever show the mechanism that would prevent a monkey from becoming an ape.
“A wise man changes his mind, a fool never.”
Well, thinking that evolution is an atheist concern, that would be a fool sticking to what he knows in the face of actual evidence, huh?
