Eric Rudolph is not a terrorist, but an anti-terrorist fighter. Those who have killed babykilling abortionists have done so to protect the innocent. People use force everyday to protect the innocent and no one has a problem with it, except when it comes to protecting unborn human beings, then they go ballistic. It's very simple, the unborn deserve the same protection as the born. Born people are protected with force quite often. Force that you would be glad if it was to protect your children against a murderer. Force that you yourself might use to protect your own children from being murdered. The unborn deserve the same protection.
SAY THIS PRAYER: Dear Jesus, I am a sinner and am headed to eternal hell because of my sins. I believe you died on the cross to take away my sins and to take me to heaven. Jesus, I ask you now to come into my heart and take away my sins and give me eternal life.
37 comments
I've always been curious. If Jebus died for our sins, why do we still have sin? Are you saying your savior died in vain, as his death did absolutely nothing?
If he did indeed take all sin away, wouldn't it be a fair assumption to say that, I don't know, sin would be gone?
Edit:
As for the whole abortion thing, I hope you don't scratch your arm, or jerk off, or the like. By doing so, you're killing millions and millions of 'potential people' and little human cells, which sperm and embryos basically are.
@aaa
Indeed.
The Bible doesn't say anything about abortion. Jerkoffs like you twisted the "Thou shalt not kill" provision to suit your need to control women.
By the way, that's Rev. SHITZ not Spitz. For all the shitting he's doing in here.
The bomb in the olympic parc wasn´t directed solely at abortionists, so even with your reasoning, David, Eric Rudolph is a terrorist.
And as an analogon to your own list in which you declare people as murderers or accomplices of murderers who don´t openly speak out against abortions (but are in support of abortion and/or in some way involved in it)
I declare you to be the accomplice of a terrorist, because you don´t openly speak out against Rudolphs actions, but are in support of them.
Even Gary North, the Dominionist, disagrees with you: one has to hold a legitimate office - that is, a government or ecclesiastical position in which blood vengeance is one of the stated duties - before he can go off and start killing people.
That's actually pretty progressive for 3000 years ago (during the writing of the OT), when families would otherwise destroy each other in vengeance-driven feuds.
Apparently you are behind the times, AND also ignorant of the Ten Commandments.
"It's very simple, the unborn deserve the same protection as the born."
That's very simple and very wrong. They don't deserve the same protection as they are not sentient.
Eric Rudolph killed and maimed innocent people. Are you saying that he did no wrong because he was doing it to *protect* innocent people?
Tell it to Alice Hawthorne. Oh, wait--she's dead. Well, tell her family. I'm sure they'll understand.
Or maybe they won't.
On second thought...maybe you'd better keep this to yourself.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centennial_Olympic_Park_bombing
"It's very simple, the unborn deserve the same protection as the born."
I'm fine with that. If the unborn want an abortion I am willing to let them have it.
No human being has the right to simply seize control of the organs of another without his or her permission.
So even if we all collectively decided that zygotes, embryos and fetuses deserve equal rights with people, you're still chugging a big gulp of fail.
If I can't seize your kidneys, a fetus can't seize her uterus.
K thx bai.
Mike #539855
Kill the Mutant,Purge the Witch, Burn the Heretic!
and another one that applies
"A small mind is easily filled with faith."
Hey, Rev. Shitz. The terrorist Eric Rudolph, as well as you and your ilk are the case FOR abortion.
When you were born, your mother should have thrown you away and kept her previous bowel movement. At least a turd would have more intelligence and be a more productive member of society than you'll ever be.
"Eric Rudolph is not a terrorist, but an anti-terrorist fighter."
Using terrorist acts and not caring if the innocent are harmed. But at least you're honest in your view of him
"Eric Rudolph is not a terrorist, but an anti-terrorist fighter"
So that bombing in Atlanta's Olympic Park was just retroactive abortions, then? Enjoy your paradox, Rev. Shitz.
Your poster boy for the Pro-but-actually-anti -Life 'cause' has ensured that either Budapest or Paris will win the bid for the 2024 Olympics.
Your only possible chance for Los Angeles to host the XXXIIIth Olympiad is to vote for Hillary Clinton today. You know what is the Democrats' stance on abortion.
Enjoy your paradox II, Rev. Shitz.
...it's either that, or Budapest or Paris, Berlin, Milan/Naples or Amsterdam/Rotterdam instead of Oregon in 2028 unless you can persuade the IOC that there'll be no more terrorism - by home -grown threats such as Rudolph - in your country.
Nothing bad happened in 2012 London.
Nothing increases a country's prestige more than hosting an Olympics; just ask China. Abort all right-wing terrorists: retroactively , or become an international sporting pariah state.
Enjoy your paradox III, and you've struck out Rev. Shitz.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.