For professing Christians that are fooled into believing fish to mankind evolution is science, yet alone true, and pretend fish to mankind evolutionists are really just reporting science, take note of the hate they have of any reference to God having anything to do with anything. Fish to mankind is nothing less than an anti-science attack on the truth of God, and their behavior here shows it yet again.
21 comments
"take note of the hate they have of any reference to God"
Maybe that's because we can explain most of nature without references to god(s) and it's kind of annoying that religiots keep trying to squeeze their god(s) in anyway. How would you feel if we keep 'correcting' your bible with passages about the flying spagetti monster?
In Genesis creation takes place in this Order: Fish,
Birds (or Dinosaurs) ,Animals ( or Mammals) then Man
So the Bible describes Fish to Man
Well is the Bible the word of God or not?
I wish you fundies would make up your mind
Well if God wanted to create the Universe why didn't he create it all at once in one instant rather than creating organisms of increasing complexity one after the other.
It seems to me that the process of evolution is what is being described in Genesis. l
Well if God wanted to create the Universe why didn't he create all at once in one instant rather than creating organisms of increasing complexity one after the other.
It seems to me that the process of evolution is what is being described in Genesis. l
Here comes a bit of "hatred", then...
Fishes are just as evolved as humans are. We share a common ancestor.
For all we know, a god might have kickstarted the evolution, as it's a very effective way to make life adapt to the changing environment. Problem is, we have evidence for adaptation, but we don't have evidence for any gods.
I hope my hatred hasn't made you cry, dearie.
"Evolutionists" don't hate the biblical god any more than they hate Zeus, Odin, Tiamat or any other mythical creature. They don't think about them at all in determining how life adapted. Refusal to acknowledge does not equal hate. The only hate involved seems to be coming from your side of the aisle.
If god shows up to give any kind of evidence about his involvement in the process of evolution, we will rewrite the science books.
But I have a question for you Christians: if you believe and say stuff for which there is no factual evidence, how can we ever trust you to testify in a court of law? Science is a bit like a court - we want to see the evidence, and without it, we can disregard it entirely. That's what we do with god. Not "hate" god, IGNORE that possibility entirely.
Fish to mankind is nothing less than an anti-science attack on the truth of God
Fish to mankind doesn't say anything one way or the other about God. It's an attack on a literal reading of Genesis and a few hundred other creation stories, but even St. Augustine cast doubts on a literal interpretation of Genesis back in the 5th century.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.