@Don Underestimating women as somehow harmless isn't just sexist, it has dire consequences, even lethal hypothetically.
Just ask yourself, who stands a better chance against a female assailant? The guy who treats men and women equal or the guy who thinks women are weak and could never harm him? Gender profiling just isn't logical.
Only two things will put an end to war:
1. a federal government with authority over Earth
2. an enlightened scientific political body, ideally let's say the president of an Earth government should have at least 180 IQ and in fact very gifted people should be groomed early on for such positions
You may say "but there will still be civil war". That's possible but that too can be countered with the right social engineering.
To this end:
- ensure children get a peaceful education
- ensure that people have their basic needs met through a form of conditional basic income
- tribalism to be discouraged on all sides (this is where the social justice warriors get it wrong, they only focus on white male tribalism while ignoring or facilitating anti-white male tribalism so equality and mutual respect is never accomplished)
What are the actual conditions?
1. absolutely no violent crime
You will not go to prison immediately, less severe but still violent crimes will involve relocation in tier 2 residential areas where only other violent criminals are sent to. As technology improves we can ensure compliance easier.
2. people receiving assistance through basic income are barred from having children
Violation = castration and relocation to an area where such violators can be more easily monitored. Not prison, but limited ability to travel and interact with others.
There are many ways we can brainstorm what a scientific rational based governance would look like. It would also be far more nuanced than this childish left vs. right freak show.