Just one little shred of proof is too much for you? Quite pathetic.

"You've had it already. Fossils and the law of superposition. Fossils of extinct species. Same fossils on both sides of the Atlantic. Transitional fossils. Nylon-eating bacteria. Radiometric and radiocarbon dating. Dendrochronology. All the things you sneer at and think you know better than scientists do."

Law of super position doesn't come close to proving anything, there has been trees found through several layers, indicating the layers were deposited there is a short period of time.
Same fossils on both sides does more to disprove evolution than to prove it, it is logical that if evolution actually occurred the creatures would differ being segregated by long distances.
Transitional fossils are a joke, merely someone's opinion of how they should go, there isn't one shred of proof that any one fossil evolved into another.
Nylon-eating bacteria can eat nylon, that is not all they eat. Not sure what relevance that has, a dog my parents once had ate it's own poop - that doesn't prove evolution either.
Radiometric and radiocarbon dating based on speculation and assumption, no one knows the starting level not any outside influences. You also might want to look up the 70 year old volcanic rock that was dated at over 3 million years.
Dendrochronology? The oldest tree was determined to be 4580 years old, not proof of evolution either.
Do try again.