Arguably rape is not as bad as consensual fornication because in rape only one person is in the wrong.
26 comments
Well, go get yourself raped, then - it's not as though you'll lose any brownie points with the big guy. Failing that, go die in a fire!
So, one person being terrorized and violated is better than two people just having a good time?
You, sir, are both sick and evil. You are redefining rape in terms of the perpetrator, while you spare not a thought for the victim. Your religion taught you that, to think of people as souls rather than flesh and blood. Religion is supposed to make you a better person, as so many people say, but step outside religion and see that there's nothing "better" about a person who could worry about the rapist only.
What about the people who say that she shouldn't have been dressed like that? Or when you say one person is in the wrong are you blaming the victim already?
But really, I honestly want to know what's so incredibly bad about consensual, consequence-free sex?
Would you say the same thing if you were the one being raped, ct? Would you really think that "this is not as bad as consensual sex"?
More like chaotic-stupid.
If the rapist only marries the victim, then no-one is bound for hell.
@Frogflayer & Swede: But if the rapist doesn't marry their victim, and the victim doesn't yell loud enough to attract help (even if they are physically prevented from doing so), they both go to Hell according to the Bible. So this idiot doesn't even get their own religion right.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
