Without question, any reasonably well-read, unbiased induvidual would be very hard pressed to not list Hitler as the most reasonable, and trustworthy of the major WW2 leaders. The "Big Three" were liars amongst themselves let alone to Hitler. Hitler had more honor than all three combined and was, indeed a man of his word. In my opinion Roosevelt was even larger filth than Stalin, as Stalin at least didn't pretend. Churchill did whatever was expedient for the moment. In the end the jews write the story and the magnitude to which Hitlers name is sullied is the mark of his HONOR.
11 comments
Except that he lied about his territorial claims in Europe, the "stab in the back" as a cause for Germany's defeat in World War I was a lie, the blood libel is a lie, the stories about Czechs and Poles attacking Germans were lies, the stories of Jewish influence were lies, the racial theories were lies, the promise made to Stalin was a lie, the promise of a miraculous final victory was a lie. And his memory encourages little Nazis like you to lie about him still.
No, it's a mark of his dishonor. No well-read unbiased individual would ignore, deny, or downplay the Holocaust.
I lived in Israel in the 1970s and knew people with concentration camp tattoos.
I really disagree with a lot of Israeli policies, but still wish people like this would try to explain their theories to Sabra reservists who have just come off duty.
So the idiot that knifed his political allies in the back the moment he took power and imprisoned and/or executed vast numbers of his own countrymen for being 'undesireable' is the most trustworthy?
The guy who picked a fight with the entire planet and broke a non-agression pact with Russia in the middle of freaking winter opening up a second front at the most suicidally inopportune moment ensuring his total defeat is the most reasonable?
Hitler: The most stunningly ineffectual political leader of the day taking credit for his cronies and blessed with a small amount of personal charisma and supernaturally good luck.
Hitler: The lunatic who blundered into the worst tactical error in military history followed by the second and third best runners up when he surrounded Germany in 360 degrees of furious armies, spread himself so thin he had to conscript virtually every man old enough to be potty trained and thinned them out further by tossing them into the meat grinder.
Hitler: The man who committed the worst hate crime in human history. Full stop.
Yeah, that's one hell of a resume. Honorable mention to nothing past his cult of personality formed of zero personal merit.
Hitler as the most reasonable, and trustworthy of the major WW2 leaders
His last public apparition was for handing Iron Crosses to child soldiers in the Volkssturm in the Berlin ruins.
He picked a fight with all the major world powers ,believed to and spoke about the "final victory" (Endsieg ) and "fanatic resistance" (Fanatischer Widerstand ) litteraly until his last breath and sent thousands of militiamen to die for a lost cause.
Hitler had more honor than all three combined and was, indeed a man of his word.
Poles, Czechoslovakians, Soviets and Belgians among others saw well how his pacts of non-aggression were upheld.
And planning to enslave and exterminate millions of human beings is not exactly the idea I have of honor.
Setting aside all of the lies and manipulation Hitler engaged in, being a "man of his word" doesn't really mean shit when his "word" was full of violent, hateful rhetoric designed to justify persecution and murder.
....the magnitude to which Hitlers name is sullied is the mark of his HONOR.
Says the guy who sullies the names of these guys....image image
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
