“The thing is, they believe, with out knowledge, that we know nothing,”
Can’t say ‘without knowledge,’ dude. I’ve read (y’all’s) posts. The arguments are presuppositionist, the evidence is anecdotal, the criticisms betray a STUNNING lack of knowledge about science in general and evolution in particular. You may not be an imbecile, but you’re prioritizing the wrong things in a science debate, which makes you LOOK stupid as fuck.
“and are complete morons for believe what we believe,”
At least for the reasons you post….
Much the way people insist on offering Pascal’s Wager, and insisting it’s a good argument for believing.
“because they must be right, lol,”
Sounds like Creationists, actually. They insist they’re right because they think the option is a godless universe. Evolution is right because the HUGE piles of evidence support it.
"the arogance it takes for them to compare us to Santa Clause is unbelivable.”
The Tim Allen movies?
But it’s not arrogance. Just critical analysis.
We don’t compare YOU to Santa, we compare your belief in the skybeast to a kid’s belief in Santa.
There’s no evidence for either, You’re just told about them when you’re too young to question them. Everyone has a basic understanding of what they want from us, and what they can do for us. But at some point you peek behind the curtain and find out it’s all explained without any magic. And you insist GOD’s magic is realer than Santa’s.
"They act as if I have never research a tiny bit of my faith,”
Research? Did you consult any critical sources, or just experts within the faith telling you what you need to believe?
“and neither has anyone else,”
I’ve seen believer research. Guy said he knew ALL ABOUT the Flood story, and insisted i was wrong that some animals were brought aboard in 7 pairs. He didn’t have to read that closely because he already knew what was in there.
"they are blind, and don't want to learn anything.”
Ironic.
