Atheist: do you not give birth after your own kind?
Long before satan fed you evolution God said: "Let the earth bring forth the living creature according to it's kind" (Genesis 1:24)
Dogs do not give birth to roaches.
80 comments
> are we not reproducing after our own kind
Yes, but with several minor differences, visible or not. That's why you don't look identical to either of your parents. Give it a million years and those differences build up.
"Atheist: do you not give birth after your own kind?"
Nobody ever fed me evolution. Evolution is not a thing, it is a process. An observable and widely documented process that has been the foundation of our economy for over 10,000 years.
"man do not give birth to monkeys."
i beg to differ! [/ad hominem for the lulz]
also,
"shameless liars are we not reproducing after our own kind."
wut does that mean? o_0
"Atheist: do you not give birth after your own kind?"
Please stop talking like a King James knockoff.
"Long before satan fed you evolution God said: "Let the earth bring forth the living creature according to it's kind" (Genesis 1:24)"
Yes. And?
"Dogs do not give birth to roaches."
Obviously. That would just be silly.
"man do not give birth to monkeys."
No, but we do give birth to apes.
"shameless liars are we not reproducing after our own kind."
Yes. We are. Now, what was the point of all of this exactly?
If something gave birth to another species, it would disprove evolution.
The answer is "yes." All people are born atheists.
What? No. We'll all born with no idea what the fuck religion is. That isn't atheism.
Andy, Andy mate.
Not exactly, since babies are not clones. Mutations, while rare, can and do happen. Those that make it more likely to be passed on are, by definition, more likely to be passed on, and therefore to become more prevalent in future generations.
The first statement is a known fact, the last is a tautology. Next question.
Atheist: do you not give birth after your own kind?
Sure, we have atheist kids of our own. Christians, on the other hand, don't give birth to Christian kids - Christianity has to be induced.
Oh, did you mean something else?
Long before satan fed you evolution God said: "Let the earth bring forth the living creature according to it's kind" (Genesis 1:24)
God said no such thing. Some bronze age Arabs said that about 3,500 years ago and claimed God said it.
Nothing reproduces exactly its own kind. Do you look exactly like your parents? What did your ancestors look like a million years ago? 10 million?
Fundamentalist creationists like to insist that man was created in God's image. They take that quite literally, although they tend to be rather quiet when asked about God's penis.
Whatever, we now have the internet and the subsequent capability of any and every idiot to spew his or her crap all over the planet. The internet has shown quite dramatically that the average human is pretty dumb. Not only the average human, but, in fact, the majority. Andy 11-11 is mainstream.
This raises the question about God and his image.
The God of the Bible may be powerful, but he's obviously pretty much of an idiot.
1. We do often raise atheists as well. See this list of second-generation atheists .
2. We atheists encourage open-minded, critical evaluation of theories. I would rather have a kid who believed in God because she felt it was the rational choice than one who was an atheist entirely because I am. I'm a rationalist first, and an atheist second.
3. It's one thing to mix up the words "it's" and "its"*, and quite another to attribute this error to the freaking Bible , especially since you could just copy and paste the damn thing off of BibleGateway. I mean, it's not like they're going to sue you for copyright infringement.
*"It's" is short for "it is," or more rarely "it has." Otherwise the apostrophe is incorrect. Note that in my paragraph above there were two abbreviations of "it is."
Edit: Wait, was this about evolution? I thought you were saying "atheists don't have atheist children because their ideas are weak and/or lies.". Well, learn to make your points more coherently. And learn that most people who believe in evolution also believe that it is part of God's design.
Are you exactly the exact same as one of your parents? Odds are you have 50-50 split thus forming differences. Now it could be that slightly longer nose that your mother has, and slightly small jawline that your father has but the point is your not a exact clone of either. Now have this happen for your children and their children and so on, say a million years or so, and somehow everyone in the town/city became isolated with no one coming in or out but somehow food and water was able to still to provide for them. Then after the million years, you open the gates again. Odds there would be a new species of humanity.
That's evolution in a nutshell, small differences over long time and isolation equals big changes.
Tell me, those who believe in "kinds:" how do you explain the liger?
Ligers are the result of breeding a lion with a tiger. You might claim that this shows lions and tigers are of the same "kind," but then a problem arises: ligers, like most hybrids, are infertile. If lions and tigers are of the same "kind," they should be able to produce fertile offspring. And if they're different "kinds," they shouldn't be able to reproduce at all.
The theory of evolution explains ligers quite nicely: lions and tigers used to be the same species of big cat, but genetic drift and environmental factors caused two populations of the species to drift apart until they could reproduce with one another, but not with the other popuilation.
@Reckoner
WTF is a "kind"?
image
KING:
HAMLET:
;-))
Andy 11-11's mom apparently gave birth to someone of monkey-like intelligence.
Andy, were you there when Bible-god supposedly said that about bringing forth? Was it recorded on audio or video? No? Then I'm afraid I'll have to ask for some kind of evidence, man.
Dogs are a family. Roaches are an order. Humans are a species. Monkeys are a polyphyletic group. WTF is a 'kind?'
Your god is awful at biology.
And if "bats don't give birth to birds" is your idea of profound divinely inspired knowledge, I'm afraid you're going to have to quite a bit better.
Wait a minute ...
Dogs are a family. Roaches are an order. Humans are a species. Monkeys are a polyphyletic group. WTF is a 'kind?'
Your god is awful at biology.
And if "bats don't give birth to birds" is your idea of profound divinely inspired knowledge, I'm afraid you're going to have to quite a bit better.
Wait a minute ...
@ Kevin Klawitter
I disagree. We come out of the womb without any concept of god or gods. Thus we are without god/gods, which is a literal definition of the term "atheist."
To be agnostic implies that the concept of god/gods has been introduced, but the subject is unconvinced of the concept's validity. It is therefore an appraisal of a concept that must, of necessity be introduced to us after we are born.
To be fair though, I don't think its important enough to argue over
This is stupid on multiple levels. Okay, let's look at things that reproduce after their own "kind" perfectly: single-celled organisms. Bacteria don't fuck one another(well, actually, they do, but that's something else entirely), they split down the middle and clone themselves. If that's not giving birth to it's own kind, then nothing is.
And even THEN bacterial evolution occurs. Look at mutant drug-resistant infections! Nylon-eating bacteria! Extremophyles!
Sorry, your argument holds absolutely no water at all.
Shameless idiot to base your opinion on a book written about 2,600 years ago. Man has learned since then. Why don't you try to use what some would call your God-given intelligence - assuming you have any. That's moot, I would say.
I don't give birth at all, as I haven't been able to concieve.
We have evidence for evolution.
Dogs, roaches, humans and monkeys are all just as evolved, and all are contemporary to each other. Evolution means one version becomes extinct and one version lives on. Only extinct version can be ancestors to today's animals, plants and fungi.
Actually, evolution IS the Earth bringing forth the living creatures.
I'm no biologist, but I understand more about evolution than Andy here.
Also, I'm a man, therefore highly unlikely to give birth at all, monkey or otherwise.
Wait, your supposedly all-knowing and perfect wholly babble doesn't know the difference between "its" and "it's"?
Yaweh's grammar sucks. Thor wins this round.
"Atheist: do you not give birth after your own kind?"
We're all born Atheists.
...oh, and whenever the lady in my life and I have sex, I use condoms. [/smartarse]
"man do not give birth to monkeys.
Fact: We humans (Homo Sapiens ) share at least 98% of our DNA with Chimpanzees (Pan Troglodytes ). Facts - when backed up by evidence - are impossible to dispute. "Shameless liars "? A definite case of...:
image
Translation: 'If we evolved from monkeys, how come there are still monkeys?', only less coherent.
Riddle me this: If Protestantism evolved from Catholicism, why are there still Catholics?
You, my friend is stupid and to incompetent to even debate about this subject. Beat it!
It is a sucha small change that you might notice it slightly after several centuris.
So if liars dosen't reprodce then why are there over 10 million atheists?
man giving birth to monkeys?
Wait a second... I thought you fundie fruitloops thought evolution was all about monkeys giving birth to man? Tip: If you turn your strawman upside down it doesn't make it any less straw!
I don't even have to explain mutations to debunk this.
ring species, you dumbass, google it.
Theistic evolutionists adore that verse. Why? Because they stretch the meaning of it a little bit and think it's, you know, BIblical proof of evolution. Not as insane as you, but still a bit odd.
“theist: do you not give birth after your own kind?”
“Long before satan fed you evolution”
“God said: "Let the earth bring forth the living creature according to it's kind" (Genesis 1:24)”
“Dogs do not give birth to roaches.”
“man do not give birth to monkeys.”
“shameless liars are we not reproducing after our own kind.”
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
