[A fine example of someone commenting on something with absolutely no knowledge of what they're talking about except for what they read on Hovind's site]

Oops I was wrong, macro evolution according to you has happened. But wait, maybe you aren't understanding the concept of macro-evolution. Let me explain. In macro evolution, something of one kind has to be able to be produced from another kind. DNA has to be added. This added part is the key to it. Many things have been mutated, which is basically either losing or copying DNA. You can give a fly extra wings but you aren't adding to it, you're copying. Bacteria can gain resistance to antibiotics, but it's due to the loss of the ribosome that the antibiotic would typically cling to. It may seem like a benefit but it's losing information which is the direct opposite of evolution.