No, they can keep smiting me then.
Females should be married once they are able to have children.
Females should be controlled by men; this is good for men.
Old Christianity generally supports men and keeps women in their place and thus can be useful to men.
46 comments
1) The best parts of you ran down your mother's leg, after she couldn't outrun her brothers.
2) That's the last time you were anywhere near a woman's naughty bits.
Females should be controlled by men; this is good for men.
I don´t doubt it. But it is bad for women ;)
Old Christianity generally supports men and keeps women in their place and thus can be useful to men.
One might say more correctly, women in the OT are treated as objects, pure property first of their fathers and then of their husbands. One of the reasons why it is good to live in a secular society where church does´t have any say in politics.
"Females should be married"
To each other! w0000.
"Females should be controlled by men; this is good for men."
No, that's terrible for me. I'm not controlling. It's hard to explain. Have you ever seen Neon Genesis Evangelion?
Someone has such low self-esteem, and is so cowardly, that he has to abuse and control women just to make himself feel good. I'm not pointing fingers. Actually, I am. *points at testy*
Females should be married once they are able to have children.
Before they mature mentally enough to realise you are a useless ass who couldn't handle someone your own age.
Females should be controlled by men; this is good for men.
It is indicative of your general uselessness that you require complete control of other humans in order to mean something.
Old Christianity generally supports men and keeps women in their place and thus can be useful to men.
It's a fundie life support system for useless, undeserving men whose societal privileges were the only thing preventing them from dying alone in their incontinence, as you will.
I'm not your fucking doll to be played with and ordered around, and I will not obey you perfectly. My theory is, "well, God gave me a brain, so obviously, he must have given it to me for a reason, and that reason is to think and learn, and to make the world better for all people."
Progress, man! Have you heard of it? We've made some since the time of the Old Testament!
"Old" Xianity, which means OT Xianity, which means not Xian at all. That's a relief to real Christians, I'm sure.
Pathetic, the rest.
Clean the splooge off your keyboard, boy.
This is the post that testy was responding to:
Testy asked, "Why does everyone keep "smiting" me?"
Someone else replied, "Probably because they know you're mikeeusa, and/or because your repetively writings about marrying 14-year-old females is tedious and harmful to the forum's reputation. For the record, I haven't smited you. I hope you can contribute something of value to the board. A good start would be to reain from talking about a) your desire to marry 14-year-old females; b) wanting to control women, and; c) your Christian beliefs."
THIS is what he was saying "No, they can keep smiting me then" in response to. :-O
So I did a bit of research on this guy's other username ("mikeeusa"...it's mentioned in post #2 of the quoted thread), and oh, my gosh. This is one of the few people that I actually WANT to DIAF. Apparently, he literally hates feminists and wants them dead. Here's proof: http://womanofsteele.blogspot.com/2007/11/hater-mikeeusa.html . This guy is a serious, serious nutjob.
@Hannah: Unfortunately, that is what a lot of MRAs want, in varying degrees. They're the same as the people who think the Christian Right is oppressed - full of shit. Anyone has done even a little research knows white dudes are still the most privileged people in society, so I cannot sympathise with the greedy, whiny fucks. I really can't. It's one of the reasons I like coming here, since most posters here - barring Messianic Servant and other trolls - are sane.
I doubt that hardly any of the men in the world would be as 'controlling' as this guy would want them to be.
Hell, I know I would never be able to.
/Females should be married once they are able to have children./
Pedophile.
/Females should be controlled by men; this is good for men./
Misogynist.
/Old Christianity generally supports men and keeps women in their place and thus can be useful to men./
Religious fundamentalist.
Oh, boy, we've got ourselves a triple-stinker here, don't we!
Some girls can have children as young as 11 years of age or even younger, some can't until much older. How would you decide on whether or not a girl is able to concieve? Not to mention the fact that just because a girl is physically able to give birth it doesn't mean she is mentally or emotionally mature enough to go through such an experince or raise her own kids, especially if she was brought up by fundies. And I cannot be the only one who would really, really fucking hate to be married to an 11 year old.
Edit I just checked who made this post. It's testy. I'm pretty sure he's a poe, mainly because of his name.
How can one know that the females are able to have children before they have tried? Only females who have a kid are allowed to marry?
How is it good for men to control females? What about the females, is it good for them to be controlled? Or is it good for them to control males, perhaps?
Does the species of the females don't count, or what? Normally, when you use the word "men", you then use the word "women". If you want to use the word "female", then you ought to use the word "male" along with it.
The misogyny is one of the biggest problems with "Old Christianity".
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.