bobx23456 #conspiracy #homophobia mens-rights.net
Yes, Sesame Street tries to teach faggotry and socialism to children.
Telletubies is also a fag infomercial for really young children.
Blessings
Bob
Yes, Sesame Street tries to teach faggotry and socialism to children.
Telletubies is also a fag infomercial for really young children.
Blessings
Bob
Only problem with nailing fags to a fence post is it might allow one of their contagious diseases to infect a normal Human. The best thing the government can do is kill them and burn their carcasses. Society needs to be protected from these monsters.
The United Nations is an evil hate movement, run by feminazis and fags. During the 1990s the UN affiliated itself with high profile fag groups who suppored paedophilia. The UN continued to support for the evil pro-paedophilia fag groups until the US Government threatened to stop providing them with funding.
The dark secret of Nazism is that the rise of the National Socialist Party (Nazis) was the first great victory for FEMALE SUFFRAGE. German men, by and large, voted for sane candidates and reasonable programs. Irrational females voted for emotional appeals and false promises. Females in huge numbers swooned for the little dictator. Feminism is not "like" Nazism. Feminism and Nazism are IDENTICAL
*Cannabis abuser 'snapped his 16-month-old daughter's back in two'*
I don't know. I've lost all my sympathy for cunts, even little ones. Had she survived she would have hated men all her life.
I'm also wondering about the alleged "facts" of the case. The fellow is said to be "cannabis user" which tends to make people more mellow. I'm wondering if the abusive mother wasn't actually the guilty party in most of the injuries to the child.
But the school we're talking about here is a normal school for hetero kids to learn real stuff, it's not a school for freaks to learn how to diddle each others clits.
*a principal outs a lesbian student who was being picked on*
She should have listened to the message the other students were trying to teach her. The Principal also tried to help her straighten out her life -- doing his job. Good parents don't want their children recruited for psychosexual perversion by mixed up sexual deviants in schools. If the girl wouldn't straighten up she should have been permanently expelled from the school. That's the Principal's job.
"A two-time candidate for governor who is charged with attempting to “entice” a 13-year-old girl and her 11-year-old sister to engage in “illegal sexual activity” says the allegations against him stem from a misunderstanding."
Once again the government ought to be minding its own f'ing business. This kind of anti-men hate campaign really burns my biscuits.
A real man rejects feminism.
A metro-sexual supports it in everyway.
Which man do women want in their life?
A man or a fag?
Can't have both.
How about this?
We'll have something called a relationship and you be the woman and I'll be the man?
RADICAL
"The family of a gay teenager who was fatally shot in class blames the school district for allowing their son to wear makeup and feminine clothing to school — factors the family claims led to the death"
The parents should have given him a good whippin' and told him to shape up.
If the schools is to blame it's for allowing faggots to attend and recruit.
"Everyone agrees that convicted felons should not have guns, but misdemeanors are minor offenses that usually carry no jail time."
"Everyone agrees"? The lying asshole should speak for himself. Such lies are a very common way that PC hate mongers use rhetoric to spread and perpetuate their offensive hate.
Everyone does not agree. Only in the blind eyes of the anti-gun, anti-men, anti-white lobby does such PC attitudes become "everyone."
Rather than bulletproof bras, the females should all be sent home to mind their husband's home and kitchen.
If they're African they are probably black, meaning that they cannot be punished because white people somehow forced them to do it.
It's so elaborate it seems like a custom from Nigeria, and therefore it is wrong and evil of white people to interfere or punish them.
Therefore they probably are not in jail. They are probably being rewarded
Asiatic culture is marred by a long list of savage social mores such as animal torture, ill-treatment of Humans and a complete disregard for the environment. Referring to the savages from the East as "Asiatic savages" is a truthful representation of what they are, evil barbarians who lack empathy. If that makes me a racist, then so be it. I won't keep my tongue in check just because you don't like hearing the truth about Asians.
Freud is occasionally valid. Asserting that men rape because they are men is classic penis envy. Those women only wish they could rape good looking boys because they are probably too ugly or their personalities are too vile to be able to seduce even a kid. But they can't because they either know they are too weak or afraid they might be.
"An Anderson (SC) man who had alleged his father attacked him with a baseball bat "to cast the demons of homosexuality out of him"
Wishful thinking. More fathers should have such courage and take moral responsibility.
The term "fascist" sums up the "liberals" quite well.
It's beneficial to men to marry young females of childbearing age because men are attracted to young females of childbearing age.
I do not care how "necessary" or "unnecessary" it is today from the perspective of Men being used as a TOOL for the society.
Men do not exist for the benifit of the society. Men exist for the benifit of themselves.
Young, sweet, lively females make men happy.
Thus Men should have said females.
MEN DO NOT EXIST TO SERVE THE SOCIETY.
Though you believe we do. You believe that we are beasts of burden that must be denied our wives because it may nolonger be convienent to this civilization...
so once men's desires stop serving society you are FINE with punishing, jailing, banishing, and murdering men for seeking out that which they love... just because men are no longer
useful as TOOLS of the society or state.
If the society is not built for the benefit of Men than it is built for the benefit of someone else.
*about the mens rights movement*
A woman speaking for a movement that doesn't exist.
How many feminists have been killed by this movement?
How many laws have been changed?
None. The movement doesn't exist.
It's just peeps complaining on the net mostly.
Here's a counterpoint: The Islamic movement does exist: it's killed loads of it's enemies and has had laws changed to its will (esp in UK and canada).
Another counterpoint: The black rights movement did exit: it killed a number of its opponents (via the black panthers) and did have many laws changed to it's will in the US and western world.
Another counterpoint: The women's movement: it has had thousands of husbands murdered by their wives with impunity. Millions of men jailed at the behest of women. Every law it wanted passed and changed.
When the men's movement starts murdering the enemies of Men (feminist women and their supporters) AND if one day my opinions some how lower the rate of the murder of feminist women... then I'll shut up. I would never want to harm the effectivness of a REAL men's movement. A movement where feminist women and their supporters DIE.
The men's movement does not yet exist.
"The contraceptive Pill is outdated and leading to unwanted pregnancies and abortion as few women take it correctly, a leading expert said."
More feminist propaganda masquerading as science.
BC pills work just fine. Females don't take them because they WANT to be pregnant. The big lie is "unwanted pregnancy."
I get tired of the racist crap. Black people have always been at the center of slavery management. For several hundred years, black slave raiders preyed on European villages. An estimated 1,000,000 white Europeans were captured and sold into slavery in black Africa. When white Europe eventually became powerful enough to fend off the African slavers, the African slave traders competed to sell slaves to European buyers. In the US before the Civil War, there were an estimated 10,000 black slave OWNERS.
Pretending that slavery was ever about "black people slaves" is racist hate, and that's all that it is. Being female is not an excuse for racist anti-white hate.
No, they can keep smiting me then.
Females should be married once they are able to have children.
Females should be controlled by men; this is good for men.
Old Christianity generally supports men and keeps women in their place and thus can be useful to men.
When any of the idiots push this "pregnant man" crap, and its pure crap, they need to be sent back to 1st grade to review basic word definitions, and then to 4th greade to review basic biology.
"Pregnant" is the definiton of "female" or "woman."
Females should be married off once they are able to have children.
The school system is for keeping females unmarried so mature men cannot have the wives they desire.
Notice how the teachers, those who destroy men's society, think they are moral arbitrators (ie: god)
*a woman pointed out a man who tortured her in court*
Indeed, any female will point to the guy at the defense table. If the defense had been allowed to switch the accused with some spectator, and put the accused seated in the third row with the tourists, she still would have pointed at the man at the accused table. Witness testimony is worse than useless. They would convict a ham sandwich if the rules allowed them to accuse one.
Abortion is a MEN'S rights issue.
There was nothing wrong with him beating her for trying to refuse sex with him. I'd have murdered her and gotten a new wife: that one is just a feminist female and ALL feminist females should be killed because they dislike Men.
*about women in third world countries having less rights than children in the western world*
This is a typical example of lying by comparing apples and oranges.
Saudi women should be compared to Saudi children, not to American children.
In addition, western children have far too many "rights" for their own good. Family discipline has gone from families, esepecially female headed households. Children grow up without discipline and fail at life.
Obviously the Saudi's don't have 4 million men in prisons, nor 50% of their marriages failing.
*this person believes feminists all try to take control of the world and take control over men*
Bad MAN! Bad MAN! Take away his children! Send him to prison! Bad Man!
Is there anywhere that fathers are not called "bad' and sent to prison?
*a man is jailed for forcing his daughter to kill the family cat*
A FATHER should have the right to decide how to teach his children. In times past children belonged to fathers and his will and his decision was respected by law. Now we have the gynocracy overlooking all Fathers and arresting them for "abuse" or whatever lies the nanny state can spew.
Maybe we don't think girls should be taught to kill. Maybe we would have made a different choice for our children. But we need to respect fathers and the father's rights to HIS family. It's HIS place to decide what is right for HIS daughter. It is not our place to tell the next father over what to do or not do with HIS children.
We can't have it both ways. We either support FATHERS rights or state gynocracy rights. I'm on the side of FATHERS rights.
In my opinion the blue gun thugs who arrested and caged the man should spend 20 years in their own hell for wrongly interfering with a FATHER and HIS children, and for criminal brutalizing and caging of a father.
*talking about women being stoned in the middle east for sex outside of marriage, which the other mens' rights activists were against*
What the hey. It was only a female. She violated traditional law. Men are in control in that community. She violated men's control and learned the hard way.
On several other topics you seem to have the program of men's rights. But then I find this and you are about to sack men for following historic assertion of male control. Which side are you on? The men's side, or the fmeinist side? Now I'm confused
*upon hearing the news that a man killed his wife's lover*
The guy killed the wrong party.
*someone else said the murderer had no right to kill anyone*
Well, I don't know. Under feminist law not. But under the religious law of major religions his adulterous wife should be stoned to death or otherwise dispatched.