Mr Temporao says that around 200, 000 women are treated for complications following abortions every year, the vast majority of them believed to have taken place in illegal clinics involving a high degree of risk for the women.
Round the number down to about 2, 000 per year. Abortion supporters have always inflated the numbers to gain sympathy for their cause.
30 comments
If you're going to challenge a statistic, provide a citation for it. Otherwise, it's just a number you made up yourself. The WHO estimated 68,000 deaths from "unsafe" abortions for the year 2000. So we can assume the complication count to be higher than that number.
(1) Reducing the numbers to 1% of those cited isn't just "rounding down." Some people do exaggerate figures (such as you obviously are doing in reverse here), but multiplying (or dividing) by a factor of 100 isn't exaggerating -- that is called "lying." I don't know about the figures you cited originally, but I do know that your treatment of them is totally dishonest.
(b) 2,000 people with such complications is still far too many, especially if one of them is you, your sister, your daughter, etc. If fundies weren't illegally persecuting these people who only want a perfectly legal procedure, causing so many legal clinics to close, then many of these problems would not exist; therefore, it is the religious fundies who are to blame.
(third) You are not now, and never have been, a doctor, and you aren't even entitled to use the title you still lay claim to. You are a liar and a fraud.
~David D.G.
(third) You are not now, and never have been, a doctor, and you aren't even entitled to use the title you still lay claim to. You are a liar and a fraud.
Actually, "Doc" is a slang term for Navy corpsman. So, much as I hate to admit it, HM3 Ratigan has every right to call himself "Doc."
He's still a fraud for calling himself "Doc" because he can't reasonably expect the vast majority of civilians to know that "Doc" is nothing more than a lame nickname for corpsmen. He has to know that he's tricking people into believing he has more substantial medical knowledge than he actually does. He's presenting himself as a medical expert when really all he did in the Navy was take temperatures and apply Band-Aids.
By inflating his own image by using a nickname that most people associate only with actual medical doctors, he's guilty of the same thing he's criticizing: Distorting the truth for personal gain.
Oh, and I checked the UCMJ. Representing himself in such a way that makes the Navy look bad by association is against the UCMJ. The military very rarely enforces infractions by civilians, but technically, he still could be charged. If nothing else, he could lose his VA benefits.
My dad's an Air Force vet. My husband's a Navy vet. Guys like this asshole really piss me off. He doesn't deserve to wear his former title. He doesn't deserve to represent US veterans.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.