you cruisin' for another quotin'
does the UK have a problem with pedophile priests or is that more an American issue?
There have been a few, but they've mostly been Catholic ones; it's been more the celebrity paedos exposed via Operation Ore, and post-Jimmy Savile, Operation Yewtree: Gary Glitter, Max Clifford & Rolf Harris being the most prominent, and catastrophic downfalls.
The Church of England have no compunction in making it a police matter should it be proved that one of their vicars, bishops etc has been committing such vile acts.
The nearest thing to the UK being the massive scandal in Ireland, and for decades; how the RCC there not only knew it was happening but conspired to help said priests.
As the Catholic church had all but absolute political power in that country, the fall was all but total there; it showed in the S-SM referendum there a year or so ago. When once the RCC would have had the power to prevent such from happening, they are now politically impotent, thus 62% of people decided legislation, and S-SM became completely legal. The big one: Abortion. Again, since that scandal, the RCC there can do less than fuck all about it. All it takes is lobbying now.
Romans 13:1-5 indeed.
Britain is a fine country with a courageous people and a rich cultural history. It's sad to watch it overrun by a cult of pedophile serial rapists
...so how is it that the devout Muslim Mo Farah will receive a Knighthood? And Gary Glitter will most probably die in jail?
But you probably think otherwise when you're fed bullshit from any source other than BBC News/Reuters etc. And Operation Yewtree will ensure, post-Jimmy Savile, our cultural history won't be overrun by serial rapists: who aren't Muslim.
He Who Must Not Be Named daren't acknowledge that rapists/child sex offenders who are immigrants are arrested, convicted & deported from the UK by our police/courts/immigration officials, and their actions not protested against by liberals: for fear of he no longer having the right to think of using his 'Sacreds' excuse. Do you want to be like him. NN: considered a retard, and the most pathetic one, at that? Unless you want to continue proving you are with these quotes, stop thinking the way you do. You're only proving yourself wrong whenever you do.
Muslims have existed in the US since the mid-19th Century. Why so unconcerned about them up to just after 10th September 2001, NeoNazi?
Why was the most recent crime down Spring Bank here in Hull - the Muslim immigrant district - a handbag snatching committed by a white man? Why has the only terrorist activity here in Hull been three bomb warnings decades ago, responsibility for which was claimed by the white & distinctly non-Muslim IRA?
Why doesn't our World Trade Centre have so many planes sticking out of it, Hull's Marina has replaced Humberside Airport as our main transport hub, along with Paragon Interchange?
Why are there three churches down Spring Bank? Why do so many of the Muslim-owned convenience stores there sell alcohol? Why is it that two of the several pubs in that Muslim district have rainbow flags in their windows, denoting they are LGBT friendly? Why is it that the nearby KCOM Stadium only has Football matches with Hull City & Rugby League games with Hull FC, and not the executions of 'infidels'?
Why hasn't there been a EYMS/National Express, Stagecoach or Humber FastCat bus driven into the crowds at Victoria Square of late: whenever the 'We Are Hull' show is projected onto Hull City Hall, Ferens Art Gallery & Maritime Museum, since we became City of Culture? Why no bombing during the WWII segment of said projected show?
Why did now Sir Mo Farah parade around the stadiums in London & Rio with the Union Flag, and not that of IS...?!
And why are you conspicuous by your absence in that thread since my comment there, NN? But I'm used to that: Loony4Life. Mary Jane Lick Sick. Jerky. They refused to answer my questions to my satisfaction.
Because if they did so, their entire arguments would be completely annihilated, and they'd realise that they can never justify their way of thinking.
But then, their refusal to do so proves I'm doing it right. They daren't answer my questions.
They know they're wrong.
So do you, NeoNazi. Your conspicuousness by your absence here (http://www.fstdt.net/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=122976&Page=2) and here (http://fstdt.com/QuoteComment.aspx?QID=123380&Page=1#2003915), thus your abandoning these discussions mean you concede on all your points. You admit we're right.
Just as not all Christians are fundie, not all Muslims are terrorists. But all fundies are: what's stopping them from being exactly like Quakers/Unitarian Universalists/C-of-E Anglicans, and the likes of Mo Farah, respectively? Question: Is Sir Mo Farah a terrorist? Mayor of London Sadiq Khan? He has power over the Metropolitan Police, yet he's still giving them free rein over investigating & intelligence gathering Islameist terrorists; Scotland Yard has backup from GCHQ.
Just a 'Yes' or 'No' answer to those questions is required. It won't kill you to do so: only your way of thinking.
All right-wing fundies/the likes of NeoNazi have to say is 'Not all Muslims are terrorists'. Just as we in FSTDT are the first to say that not all Christians are fundies: just ask my best friend: a long-time C-of-E Christian. Thus we defend moderates.
But if they were to admit that, there's another source of righteous indignation - and hatred - wrested away from them, thus they'd realise that they cannot justify that bigotry, and therefore they have no right to think the way they do, the poor dears. Would Donald Fart have been elected if he had no source of bigotry to rally his inbred retards: who are always wrong...?
Dunning-Kruger. It's a thing.