If science class was about science then literal bible creation would be presented.
There are good reasons why, but that is another topic. Summarily, there are no errors in the bible with regards to any physical science claims. The fact our science has in fact proven the biblical claims means that logically bible creationism should be presented in science class.
there is much work to do in science.
But the evolution debate is not about science, its about the hostile takeover of a field of study with the single goal of blocking people from hearing Gods word.
Schools should once again present the bible and what literal 6000 year creationists claim in science class. Dinosaurs existed only 1000s of years ago, not millions. the Grand Canyon was caused by the result of the great flood of Noah.
29 comments
Summarily, there are no errors in the bible with regards to any physical science claims. The fact our science has in fact proven the biblical claims means that logically bible creationism should be presented in science class.
Summarily, bats are birds, and you'd all just better get on board with that, because I SAID SCIENCE PROVED IT. Put that in a textbook, you heathen devil pagan!
-pb
Ah yes...mindlessly regurgitating the spew du jour .
Did Noah leave a calling card at the Grand Canyon? Else, how was this little nugget of YEC derived?
Can't you tell shit from Shinola yet, boy?
I thought Noah's flood happened over in the middle east along with everything else in the bible. America hadn't even been discovered when they say Noah's flood happened. Say the flood happened all over the world. Then it would take millions of years to carve the grand canyon with water, not the 40 days they say the flood lasted for.
"If science class was about science then literal bible creation would be presented."
No, myths belong in a mythology class.
"Summarily, there are no errors in the bible with regards to any physical science claims."
Have you actually read your fucking bible? Pi=3, bats are fowls, 4 legged insects, 1/3 of the stars falling to earth, the earth having 4 corners, et al.
"Schools should once again present the bible and what literal 6000 year creationists claims in science class."
Only if the class is falling asleep and the teacher wants to wake them up with humor.
The fact our science has in fact proven the biblical claims means that logically bible creationism should be presented in science class.
One would think that given how he tosses around the words fact and proven that he would have a least a passing understanding of their meaning. Sadly, it is not the case.
In other words, lets teach kids how it all happened according to your world view alone. Sir, after reviewing what you typed, all I can say is: WWWWWWWRRRRRRRROOOOONNNNGGGGG!!!!!!!!!!
Um, if you read the bible literally you come away having learned that 6 < 3.
I'm pretty sure they won't put that into science class.
(Seriously. Day 3: plants. Day 6: man. Next chapter: Before there were any plants (or animals) God made man. I'm not sure how a literal interpretation can come up with anything other than 6 < 3. And therefore 2 < 1 and 1 < 0.
NUMBERS IS A LIE OF TEH DEVIL!)
"There are good reasons why, but that is another topic."
For a science class, that is the only topic.
Why can't we have those "good reasons" now? Is Jesus bringing them?
There's no science in the Bible PERIOD! It is a work of faith. At best, it is a Fantasy, at it's most substantial, a book of allegory. IT IS NOT SCIENCE!
> If science class was about science then literal bible creation would be presented.
The Bible is not scientifically accurate.
> Summarily, there are no errors in the bible with regards to any physical science claims.
So you believe the earth is flat, the sun goes around the earth, the earth sits on pillars, pi = 3, and insects have four legs?
> Schools should once again present the bible and what literal 6000 year creationists claim in science class.
There is sufficient evidence that the earth is not 6,000 years old. Besides, your precious Bible doesn't even say how old the earth is.
> The Grand Canyon was caused by the result of the great flood of Noah.
Because apparently slow-moving water can cut into stone.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.