[Talking about larger studies refuting other studies that linked vaccines with autism and other health problems]
"failed to confirm findings"
translation: they're lieing and vaccines are still unsafe.
28 comments
Well, if you aren't going to accept any information that doesn't conform to your point of view, and instead continue citing evidence that has been disproven as the only possible explanation, despite the wide variety of other explanations that have been put forward and fit better with observed evidence, then you sir, are a moron.
Further, as someone on the autism spectrum who quite enjoys who he is, and does not feel that he needs to be "cured" of aspergers, you can go crawl into a very small hole and die, cold and alone.
It means there was no statistically significant positive or negative correlation and prior studies suggesting there was a correlation were incorrect!
YOU LOSE!
(by the way, just quietly this guy's another Chris, but without the arrogance and hatred and assuming everyone else is wrong)
Oh, Dog, not anti-vaccine loonies. That shower are second only to the Nazi crowd for being obnoxious. I tell you, they make creatonists look sane.
Someone failed Scientific Method 101. Or, more likely, never took it.
<<< Without any context, just exactly how is this "fundie" and not just run of the mill idiocy? >>>
"Fundie" isn't limited to religion. Belief, not only with no evidence for, but despite the evidence against your position, is worthy of being called "fundie".
@Crosis
"Fundie" isn't limited to religion. Belief, not only with no evidence for, but despite the evidence against your position, is worthy of being called "fundie".
Hmm. Yes, but I still thought that would have fit better in the conspiracy theories section.
Maronan.
I tried that program - I had a compilation error with 'CONFIRMS ' - I think it's been updated to CONFIRMS ITSELF to cover the 99.9999999% of exceptions thrown where the evidence bears no correlation to the point the fundie was trying to prove.
Also, most fundie parsers, on the IF NO 'evidence' case, call an INVENT RANDOM 'evidence' subroutine.
Not one single study, except a single fraudulent one, has been able to show any link with autism, whatsoever.
99,9999999999999999 percent of the studies show no links whatsoever.
00,0000000000000001 percent fabricated a link.
Is that "translation" enough for you, dolt?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.