Please deprogram yourself.
Also I`m saying this here and now, anyone ANYONE tries as much as cover a lock of my golden hair with anything else than my stoner wool cap and I`m executing the V on their entire society. I`ll die pretty before I live as someone`s slave. To all dipshits believing me simply another female to break under your torture and violence despite my attitude, you`re in for a suprise. You can cut this cute processing unit off my shoulders but my last word will be: I FUCKED YOUR GOD!
Live free or die trying, perhaps to many these are just empty words in an age of internet detachment but for me they are engraved in the deepest core of my program, they are a mental reactor which powers my unending fury towards these scum and the enrgy it produces could supply a star for a century. Not only do they have the guts to waste their own precious sentience, they actively demand we all submit as slaves and some of you good folks actually believe these fucks deserve to be reciprocated with empathy when they themselves don`t even understand the notion outside their closest relatives.
Somebody outright says: I consider you a slave and believe with all my heart you should submit as such, also if I had the necessary enfocement I wouldn`t ask, I would demand on pain of death.
How the hell some cretins respond to this with: You know, our civilisation values freedom and individuality above everything else so I can`t force you to not force others and take all we hold dear away.
Why isn`t it simpler: Then go be a slave. I am not, you will not force me nor will you silence my voice simply because it offends your terrified sentience. Use violence and force and it will be reciprocated ten times.
This would force some of the aggresive ones to commit themselves fully to their mad violence cult of course but you know what, I for one am tired of playing "don`t get mad" with a violent retard who obviously cannot grasp the idea that what he does couses tremendous pain and that he could just fuck off to a diffrent playground but he won`t because the idea would simply not occur to his damaged brain.
Had someone like that in my neighbourhood once when I was a kid. Fucker was bigger, fatter and generally took everything and would beat all the more timid kids as he liked since all the parents were trying to not cause an offence. I had enough, I might not look like much but to see this fucking sociopath beating up and killing one of our neighbours dogs(nobody liked the beast to be sure, he was a nast little old viener but ffs, he never as much as bit any of us kids without provocation and well, it was the dogs right to live, period) for the first time I switched my empathy off somehow and took a big solid piece of coal, threw it at his head then proceeded to tear him apart with fists, teeth and the occasional pieces of debris I could grasp at to take to his fucking thick brain.
I wanted to kill this bastard, wanted to give him all the pain he caused others right back and if his program was too primitive to understand why, I would carve the fucking why on his bloody remains. It took two adults to take an 8 year old off his devastated form, he did survive though but not without some permanent damage, thanks to which now he could have a reminder he could understand to never ever try to as much as touch anyone else and finally learned to wait till others were through with whatever playground constructs they were using.
All in all yes, I caused irreversible pain and damage to both his sytems and his program, shocked his every conception of how reality is to function, no doubt and made him ultimately miserable, maybe for the rest of his life. I do not regret it. Had I ended him I wouldn`t either. Because there is a diffrence in using violence and deadly force only to protect, never to take or enslave, never to gain, it`s only that most of us don`t believe we are capable of making such judgements. I disagree, make me a psycho for it if such is your want, I cannot fully convey myself through these empty letter signs but maybe some of you folks will see it is a conffesion and an anecdote about how values and perspectives are never universal, one`s victim is another`s life saving meal yet we don`t deny the rat the right to bite back even as the cat breaks his spine, we cannot deny ourselves the mandate to reciprocate with the intention to kill but we must always do it after we are only absolutely sure the threat is real and inaction will mean more suffering and in consequence more lives lost.
Claiming universality means that you give yourself a mandate to perfect morality, but such a thing does not exist. Our values in the end are just as subjective as those of the slave drivers and it does not follow that we shouldn`t hold them and by their virtue protect all we love againt aggresion and violence. Don`t think it`s all some elaborate way of attacking the refugee situation( I refuse to use the term: Crisis, safe well off poeple acting like fearful animals isn`t a crisis, it`s a terrible embarrasment for everyone involved), it is precisely our way to open our doors to a starving, freezing sentient whatever thier beliefs might be, even taking a few weakend bites so to speak, aggresion born of pure fear and overextension is after all the easiest to empathicaly understand and be given just a bit of leeway. Back to my story, I would do the same for our violent antagonist if I found him dying and freezing at my doorstep even if his later behaviour would prompt me to throw him out after he recovered.
Such a tl;dr already and I barely scraped the subject but damm it`s an important one.
You can respect someone`s life and existence without respecting their values and their behaviour if it conflicts with the most basic principles of your own. We have a muslim and chirsitan populations in any given western country but they cannot get the free pass on their primitivisms and irrational offences they take to things contradicting their beliefs as some are prone to giving them now.
Why was this british police dept. some time ago only so happy to take the puppy down as their mascot after some ignorant apes with violent preconceptions about his species said the very visage of this faithful companion animal offends them, why they themselves were not told that their views on the doggy were offensive and irrelevant to our people who by and large consider dogs our best helpers and companions and love to see them honoured and generously rewarded for their service to our kind?
It`s citing the first directive to a borg cube, so to speak.
