Y'know, the previous president was a graduate from Harvard.
I'll let you guess which subject.
PROTIP: He - and said subject - is the reason why Andy Schaftafly had such a hate-stiffy for him the last eight years.
Do you know anything about what your predecessor did, Donald Fart? Newsflash: It's the reason why the target of your impotent ire is in the august position he's in: and can make the rulings he can.
It's the reason why my local MP was returned to Parliament a couple of years ago with an increased majority. Karl Turner MP (Labour, Hull East) is a barrister: previously with Yorkshire's top law firm, Max Gold Partnership.
You'd do well to clue yourself up as to why 'That Judge' made the ruling he did. Wouldn't surprise me if, as a legal comparison, Karl had done the same.
Just as your predecessor had.
But as Karl would say:
Especially as the Speaker of the House of Commons whom he defers to, has banned you from spewing your BS in the same place where Nelson Mandela had given a speech, and is the resting place of Winston Churchill.
Overturn John Bercow's 'opinion', Wiggy. But then thrice did Scotland's legal system overturn your 'overturning' of a wind farm being built near your golf course there. Question: why did you FAIL?
Considering what's in Victoria Square right now during our year as City of Culture - and the German company responsible for it's production (and many more like it) - it wouldn't surprise me if those Scotland-located wind turbines were built at the recently expanded facilities here in Hull. I refer you to the above Labour MP - and his experience - Donald Fart.
It's what your predecessor had. 'That Judge' is certainly knowledgeable about it, ergo his ruling. When it comes to what you've sworn to defend & uphold, even kids know the basics of what it represents.
So why don't you?