Actually, there were no oceans until the universal flood.
I have studied macro-evolutionary theory and it remains just that a - a theory. A theory that now has a long list of deceits and lies . I pulled my daughter out of the atheistic government schools and she attends an excellent christian prep school. They expose the students to all theorys - the good, bad and the ugly. Problem solved. It amazes me that in the face of all the money and propaganda spent on atheistic macro evolutionary theory, that the American people overwhelmingly reject it. Evolutionary atheists are spending tons of money and yet always are on the defense. I find that interesting when they claim it is such solid science. I know science and it is actually a bunch of scientific philosophy.
38 comments
"Actually, there were no oceans until the universal flood."
Um, this isn't even correct by literalist Christian principles! Have you ever bothered to read the first chapter of the first book of your own Bible?
I sincerely hope that your daughter eventually receives some real science education to counter the appalling ignorance you have deliberately kept her in. She's the real victim being fleeced by the con artists at that so-called prep school.
You know science, but you use a word like "theorys", hmmmmm, I think you may just be lying for jeebus.
"I pulled my daughter out of the atheistic government schools and she attends an excellent christian prep school. They expose the students to all theorys - the good, bad and the ugly."
You're proud that you send your kid to a school that teaches her bad science?
I pity your daughter. Don't be surprised if you see her in a gangbang movie in 10 years.
I know science and it is actually a bunch of scientific philosophy.
It amazes me that in the face of all the money and propaganda spent on atheistic macro evolutionary theory, that the American people overwhelmingly reject it. Evolutionary atheists are spending tons of money and yet always are on the defense
Correct me if I'm wrong, but weren't there two Creationism museums that were built to the tune of a couple million dollars a piece? And a couple of other ones that are in development? So who's the one spending the money and on the defense?
It amazes me that in the face of all the money and propaganda spent on atheistic macro evolutionary theory, that the American people overwhelmingly reject it.
They do? Oh, my how far you have fallen.
Pity. You showed some real promise when you set up that secular state.
You know, if I believed what caffe said about American people, America would now be entering a new dark age. Time will tell, I guess.
"It amazes me that in the face of all the money and propaganda spent on atheistic macro evolutionary theory, that the American people overwhelmingly reject it"
Even if that were true, all it proves is that it is quite possible for very large numbers of people to be wrong about something. You know, the same way that the overhwelming majority of people on this planet used to believe it was flat. Since when has the majority always been right?
At the same time, the American majority's views on abortion, the Iraq war, or Clinton's impeachment carry no weight. The majority is always right, but only when it agrees with me.
"Excellent Chrisian Prep school" is an oxymoron. You studying "macro-evolutionary theory" is an obvious lie, as is more Americans accepting creation and rejecting science. The winner for biggest lie of the whole bunch however is "I know science"! You are a liar, and a spreader of ignorance. I pity your daughter if she ever returns to a "real school".
"I have studied macro-evolutionary theory and it remains just that a - a theory."
The fact that you are calling it "macro-evolution" demonstrates that you have no knowledge of evolution beyond the strawman lies you've been spoon-fed by your preachers.
"It amazes me that in the face of all the money and propaganda spent on atheistic macro evolutionary theory, that the American people overwhelmingly reject it."
The percentage of Americans who reject evolution outright is considerably smaller than a majority. I strongly suspect, although I can't quote solid research, that it is probably equal to the percentage of Americans who identify themselves as "born-again" Bible literalists.
By "I have studied macro-evolutionary theory", do you mean "I looked up macro-evolutionary theory on Conservapaedia and read the first paragraph"? (In all fairness, I only read the first couple sentences of this text-block)
stogoe , I'd be right there with you.
Of course, I'd be tempted to screw with the authors a bit, as well, making "creative edits" to their works.
How does "t3h 1337 bib3l v1.4 (circa 1611)" sound?
Genesis 1: 9-10And God said, Let the waters under the heavens be gathered together unto one place, and let the dry land appear: and it was so.
{I know, my roomie's KJV doesn't capitalize 'he' there.}
First of all, I doubt the validity of your statement, considering you changed the name. "Micro" & "Macro" evolutions are Creationist terms to justify why bacteria mutate and there are multiple breeds of a species while reconciling disbelief in the actual theory.
Secondly, I have a friend who goes to a private Christian school. She quite specifically told me that evolution wasn't taught & that such a high religious strain was placed on all other science that it virtually wasn't science anymore. You can't present the facts and warp them at the same time. It just doesn't work that way.
And, assuming we don't listen to my friend, what about that bit about the kid winning the Christian school science fair? "I've disproved science because I made little salt stalagmited without it taking millions of years."
Yeah. THAT'S what I mean by warping the subject.
@ stogoe:
You know what, even though I'm normally opposed to this sort of thing, I think I have no choice but to agree with you. Go back in time, tell people real science, and nip fundamentalism in the bud. If a particular religion never arises in the new world, that would just be proof that it was wrong, amirite? Anyone who claims that there were ever no oceans is so stupid that we would be doing him a favor by ensuring that he is never exposed to such a ridiculous idea.
WHAAAAAT?! I mean, dude, even if you go by a literal interpretation of the bible, that is WRONG. Before the great flood that Moses rode out on the Ark, I'm pretty darn sure that there were Oceans in there. I am very interested in what you consider 'science'. What about the fossils you can reach out and freakin' touch? What about dating things off of the layers of the Earth's crust?
If you have studied any theories, you'd know that there is nothing "just" about them. And no, you don't know science, at all.
What atheistic government? Secular is not the same as atheistic, really.
There is no real difference between macro and micro evolution; given enough time micro evolution will have snowballed into macro evolution.
the only thing that differs 'microevolution' from 'macroevolution' is a lot of time and natural selection. you lie for Jeebus when you say you 'studied' macroevolution. so, you can just stfu or keep lying for Jeebus to get yourself to hell faster. it's a choice, really.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
