The sad truth, is that the West is being totally overrun by homosexuals. Like it or not, our civilization is becoming a totally fag civilization.
You know moonbat Aldous Huxley´s "Brave New World"?? If you notice, that book is trying to sell some kind of homosexual technocratic corporate-marxist One World Government. That book is the Bible of many top moonbats.
65 comments
I’ve never read A Brave New World , but I know enough about it to know that it was an illustration of things that Huxley considered BAD .
(Wouldn’t count on Pete knowing what “dystopia” means.)
"You know moonbat Aldous Huxley´s "Brave New World"?? If you notice, that book is trying to sell some kind of homosexual technocratic corporate-marxist One World Government. That book is the Bible of many top moonbats."
Yup, and Orwell was totally for autocratic totaltarian governments.
Today is opposite day, right?
Yes, we are being overrun by homosexuals and pretty soon you won't be able to get from your house to the train station without being sodomized. In fact, buttsex will replace paper money as a form of currency. Your only hope is to gather every fundie onto a boat and leave this country.
You know moonbat Aldous Huxley´s "Brave New World"?? If you notice, that book is trying to sell some kind of homosexual technocratic corporate-marxist One World Government.
Which is why the book is rampant with descriptions of homosexual sex. OH, wait... No it wasn't, in fact it has a lot of heterosexual sex in it, which leads to the main plot line about a "savage" discovering the dystopia of Huxley's Brave New World.
Not that I would expect an drooling moron like you to grasp the subtler meaning of the book.
Pete,
That was an utterly awesome fail.
If I didn't know better, I'd think you were talking out of your ass.
Oh wait. I do know better, I read the book.
walks off muttering "stupid fucktard".....
Uh, I've never read Brave New World, but I'm pretty sure it wasn't trying to sell "homosexual technocratic corporate-marxist One World Government." You know how I know this? Because it was about a dystopic future. I do know that much.
Damn man, learn to Wikipedia!
1) There is no homosexuality in Brave New World. While sex is strongly encouraged it that society, we never see any acts of homosexuality in it.
2) Like 1982, Brave New World is a warning, not an encouragement, of what a future society could be like if we are not careful.
3) How the fuck can you have something that is corporate and Marxist?
Congratulations, you're wrong about everything. But thanks for trying.
Has this person confused Huxley's 1930's work Brave New World with Philip K Dick's 1960's novel Vulcan's Hammer , somehow...?
In this case, then is a T-Class official of Unity, shortly coming to take him, & the rest of Fuckwittery to a well deserved mandatory vacation at a "Re-Education Center"...?
In short, who gave this bunch of Gamma Minuses access to the Internet...?
Is this guy a member of the Westboro Baptist Church, perchance?
Also, way to completely, totally, and utterly miss the point of Brave New World . That book promoted vapid materialism as much as Nineteen Eighty-Four promoted totalitarianism. I bet you just hate Huxley because he was descended from Darwin's bulldog. The poor guy's probably spinning in his grave.
Yes it is true, the west is being overrun by homosexuals. They will be all that stand against the savage horde of Islamics. Eventually, Christianity will fall to the Islamic conquerors and Jesus will become no more than a faint memory. God will observe proceedings from above but will be powerless, as He usually is, to prevent an Islamic victory following the defeat of the homosexual defenders.
Its not trying to sell anything of a sort. The whole point of the Brave New World was that it was fucking terrible, you daft bugger.
Is it wrong that I find his lack of literary appreciation the most shocking part of this?
@osiris
I think you might man 1984 ;)
Someone posting on a website called MOONBATTERY using the term 'Moonbat' as an insult...
Black pot, meet black kettle...
If "Brave New World" promotes communism and homosexuality, then Winnie the Pooh promotes bestiality and the New Testament promotes sacrificing virgins at the solstice.
Really, it's pretty embarrassing to critique a work you only know from hearsay.
Read it, and we'll try again.
@Mech610
If posters from Free Republic are called "FReepers" then perhaps we should just start calling these guys Moonbats? I mean, it has a different connotation to them, but it makes sense to call them that, what with the site name and all.
(1) Although there's heterosexual sex in "BNW", homosexuality isn't even alluded to.
(2) The book is WARNING about a dystopia, not PROMOTING it!
English Lit FAIL. 'Nuff said.
Thats right, folks, if any alternative to traditional Christian culture is ever shown in a book, that book is clearly promoting that alternative!
Even when said alternative culture is clearly portrayed in that book as a bad thing!
Pete lies awake at night in terror of the coming totally fag civilization.
He sweats so hard that sweat even comes out of the end of his penis, which is frightened stiff. He trembles at the thought of all the depraved, disgusting things the fags might force him to do in the near future, the lurid imaginings of which take him several hours.
Its such a traumatic experience for him that he finds it often curdles his urine.
He thinks about it constantly.
Dear Pete:
I just received a message from alternate universe number 11,283. They are missing a village idiot answering your description. Please go home. Your frame of reference makes even less sense here.
Since I wrote it down, it must be just as true as your pontification.
The sad truth, is that the West is being totally overrun by homosexuals
I'd hardly call 10% of the population being "overrun". Morever to say you are being "overrun" implies that they are coming from somewhere else, they are not.
Like it or not, our civilization is becoming a totally fag civilization.
Oh no, a civilization where people who aren't just like you are allowed to live in peace. Whatever shall we do?
You know moonbat Aldous Huxley´s "Brave New World"?? If you notice, that book is trying to sell some kind of homosexual technocratic corporate-marxist One World Government.
You haven't even read the book, If you had you would realize that it's dystopian rather than utopian in nature.
That book is the Bible of many top moonbats
"Top moonbats"? You think that everyone you don't like is part of a big club bent on opressing you and your idiot friends, don't you?
You haven't actually read "Brave New World," I see.
Because if you had, you'd know that Huxley was explicitly warning readers about the dangers of the "technocratic corporate marxist one-world government" as described in the book.
Perhaps next you'd like to tell us how Orwell's 1984 is a liberal civics text, or how Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale is about the liberation of women from the shackles of feminism.
Read Brave New World by Aldous Huxley then try again.
As Gandalf the wizard said to Wormtongue, "The wise speak only of what they know"
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.