ChrisBP747

@ChrisBP747

LegendaryRexie #homophobia

“Gobber never seemed to be a character who is gay”

What criteria do you set here? Because whatever your beliefs on homosexuals is, we are not all alike and easily identifiable in crowds. Most people I know where pretty surprised, if not shocked to hear that I was gay. So perhaps you should reevaluate your strange opinions on us gay men.

Then again, you also believe that there are no gay vikings (because they were all manly men, so that can't possibly be the case!) and that being critisized means that freedom of speech is gone. So your worldview is already pretty warped.

J C #sexist #wingnut

Alright and now please define feminism, cultural marxism and why exactly Helga is a good example for both in your eyes. Because you just continued to speak about what alleged character traits feminists have in common with her (no evidence for that of course either) and just assumed we would agree with you. It's as if I said (hyperbolically speaking) that Adolf Hitler is a good character to compare you too, because you are both insane, are both against egalitarianism and would like to plunge the world into war. What? You didn't provide evidence for your opinions on feminists, why should I provide any for mine on you?

Oh and if I have learned anything, right-wing idiots like you LOVE to play the victim card. Here a few random examples that have been said in one way or the other by some popular right-winger: “The evil homo lobby tries to force us to bake cake!” “ The media is corrupt and against us!” “ These people coming in from other countries are out to get us!” “My religion, which is the majority religion in my country, is persecuted!” etc.etc.
So yeah, shiny mirror and all that.

Imperioratorex Caprae #homophobia

Look up the tolerance paradoxon. Karl Popper made very clear when he talked about it that tolerance can't include tolerating intolerance, because this will inevitably lead to the destruction of tolerance itself. Therefore no, I can't tolerate homophobia, because while I might tolerate them, they will never tolerate me and try to make others look at me like they do. And this in turn will lead to intolerance becoming the norm. It might sound contradictory, but we have to accept the paradoxical nature of tolerance if we want to have any form of peaceful society.

Some incels #sexist

How strange. I've actually studied two STEM university courses in my life (physics, unsuccessfully sadly and biology) and in neither I felt like my gender or that of the other students had anything to do with how much success we had (or how much it was appreciated). There were women who failed, women who excelled, men who failed and men who excelled. And of course the majority of both were around average. In fact these stories seem very fishy. 102⁄100 with extra credit and feels less appreciated because someone a bit less successful was congratulated for working hard? I feel like there is a huge chunk of the story missing (if it wasn't a pure fantasy product to begin with). Also all of these apparent geniuses seem to need everyone to bow before them because of their achievements. Guess what, that's not how the world works! I've had great grades during my master studies, and the only people who congratulated me on that was my family and close friends. And that was fine! Internalise your achievements, don't constantly crave the attention of everyone around you. If you can't get a good job with such achievements then there is something else that stops you, and its definutely not the nebulous power of evil vaginas!

EmmaRoseheart #moonbat

Reminds me of the sowjet union forbidding any form of science fiction that wasn't glorifying a “communist utopia” in some way.

Yes there are a few Sci-Fi authors who have fascist ideals and bring them into their stories. There are also many, many more who don't. There is nothing inherently fascist about sci-fi (especially since the main fascist ideology is about glorifying the PAST, not the future).

Take-The-Honk-Pill #racist #wingnut

@checkmate

It’s apparently a term meaning “fellow nazi”. Apparently they are trying to do it the “clever” way now by going the Incel route and inventing whole new dictionaries so that the EBIL JEWS who control the internet in their mind can’t find them.

Unidentified vegan activist #fundie

You know, I don’t get these people.
A vegan wants to stop animal suffering, a fair, somewhat understandable goal, especially with our extreme mass animal farming and its consequences even for ourselves. The ideology is therefore based on that every lifeform should (if possible) have a decent, nonpainful life.
And then idiots like these both cross the line and turn their own ideology on its head by stating that human life is now somehow less worthy than animal life. Why??? The sheer dumbfounding idiocy on display here is staggering!
Same goes for that fucking left-wing activist. You protest state and police oppression, but from what I can tell the minute you would be in charge you would gladly oppress and kill all your opponents. You certainly like to see them killed instead of trying to change their mind, which you definitely won’t be able to now!
It’s just saddening.

Karina Baha #ableist

I see that compassion, empathy or at least basic respect for another human being are foreign concepts to you Karina.

I mean, that you actually believe in master/slave-morality already shows that the last couple of centuries of societal progress has gone unnoticed by you. Why the hate towards people who might not have as much luck as you? Studies show that most people are fat because they are poor, and cheap food is often also unhealthy food. Others get fat because they have emotional problems, an unfavorable metabolism or yes, even because of a lack of self-control. Neither of these things should be reasons to think of them as fucking slaves/lower beings that shouldn’t dare cross your line of sight! I don’t know how you look like, but I sure as hell know that your personality on display here makes you ugly beyond compare. You should talk to incels, they’ll love you to bits!

nowig #sexist #psycho

@Malingspann

You probably mean “on average stronger” because women aren’t all physically weaker as every men (this is just not true even though sexists spread this myth all the time). And no, it would probably not change much. The problem here is that men can reproduce more often than women, meaning that in a closely associated agricultural society men sooner or later try to gather as many resources and impregnate as many women as they can. That in turn means that any women in that society has less relationships to anyone else than the men do, which in turn gives them more influence over the community as a whole.
From what I remember most matriarchal societies either are hunter-gatherers or have very strict rules when it comes to who can marry who.

Stefan Molyneux #conspiracy #racist

That’s a non-sequitor. Plain and simple. You can build houses environmentally friendly. And your conclusion doesn’t take into account that you are trying to outline a contradiction between premise 1. and 2. (the irish government says something but does something else). Yet your conclusion (that environmentalism == population replacement) would suggest that premise one and two follow up on each other (we reduce environmental impact BY importing millions of people…) which is a) illogical and b) isn’t a contradiction. So in the end you should first learn to put together logical argument in the first place for posting illogical, xenophobic crap like this.

Incel Wiki #sexist #pratt

Well, in that case, just give up dating so as not to fall into the “evil trap” of “femoids”. Problem solved.

I don’t even know what Incels even want out of sex if they think women are so evil and robot like. They could just as easily masturbate forever and be done with it. And everyone would be so much better off.

KatieMarie999 #fundie #wingnut

Look, OP? I want you to answer a few questions to me:

1) How do you treat the homeless and poor? Do you help them in any way you can? Or do you want “dirty hobos” off the street and constantly claim that poor people “should just get a job and not take your tax money”?
2) Do you treat born life equally to unborn life (as is one of the central tenets of “pro-life” ideology)? Or are you instead care enormously for a fetus and not at all for the born baby or how it will fair in a world where for example its mother can’t love it because it was conceived by rape?
3) Are you really caring for the unborn life? Or are you just searching for a way to punish the woman for having sex and control her body?
4) Would you agree that men should take equal responsibility for this unborn life? And how would you enforce that? Or haven’t you even begun to think about the man’s responsibility and only about the woman’s?

Problem is, OP, that pro-lifers like you are very adamant about wanting to protect unborn life (which is not bad per se)… but many if not most of you actually don’t care for life at all, only searching for a way to put women back into place (and yes, women can try to do that just as well as men can). And THAT’S why we sometimes call you sociopaths.

cassiebruce #homophobia

@Swede

I think she believes that she (? pretty sure it’s a she) is actually a feminist by “allowing” women to have different sexualities, but at the same time her (probably Incel, alt-right, whatever) community is so much against such a thing that she actually feels rebellious by stating that she actually is a “feminazi”.

Oh and Cassie? I’m gay. Still a man. You don’t dictate what I am and neither do all the other people who try to tell me that I’m somehow “wrong” for being like that. Deal with it.

Sepean #sexist

If you have to treat a relationship like a war and your potential partner as an enemy to be subdued, it is probably time for them to get the hell away from you, you colossal asshat!

nowig #sexist #psycho

1) There are matriarchal societies. There are few, but they exist.
2) Women DEFINITELY didn’t just sit around at home, they were pretty much equal to men in hunter-gatherer societies. Only with the advent of agriculture men suddenly had an advantage by accumulating resources (a women can only have so many children over her lifetime, while a man can take multiple wifes and therefore have many more children, strengthening his influence over a community which more and more consists of related men). Non-Paper source: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/may/14/early-men-women-equal-scientists This means that ultimately patriarchal societies aren’t necessary, they are an emergent phenomenon caused by agricultural developments that favored men. It’s not a “natural state” that has to be kept or society falls. Even considering christian morality, patriarchy is a social remnant of that time that serves no purpose nowadays (seeing as we are NOT an agricultural society anymore and monogamy is seen as the only “right” way to marry).
3) I would love to see your contribution to society and compare it to the works of oh, let’s just say Marie Curie, who gave her life for science and is the only person who ever got two nobel prices in a scientific field. Strangely enough I’d wager that you’ll probably be the one who seems to “want to consume” in relation to her or many other famous women.

Stefan Molyneux #racist

Avg IQ low 70s

I think someone is projecting a little here.

1) IQ is meaningless when it comes to measuring intelligence in general. It works for certain people and measures only certain abilities.
2) Racists always throw around IQ statistics as if they knew what they mean. From my experience they generally don’t.
3) Where do you even get this data? Did someone study racial differences between IQ? That would fail as a research question immediately, since there are no human races to speak of. Sounds like an argumentum ex culo to me.

Perhaps people not using such ridiculous arguments might help mitigate “racial” hatred. Think about that.