According to the "experts" of the world of science, Mather and Smoot's award [the Nobel Prize in Physics] is considered both expected and well-deserved. But do the discoveries of these two Americans contain anything significant to white humanity?

One of the factors that Zion uses to clear away all Aryan traditions from scientific research is the dogma of the so-called "Big Bang theory". In short, this dogma is that there is an inexplicable irrational "beginning" to the universe, an origin from which the cosmos was "created". The scientific institutions, and in particular the Nobel Committee, talk about the "childhood of the universe" and date the "birth" of the universe extensively to 13.7 billion years ago. It is on the basis of this assumption, which is anything but a proven axiom, that the two Americans have conducted their research.

The above fact may seem trivial to the survival of the white Aryan race. But if you look closely at the subjective Semitic positions that lie behind the "Big Bang theory", the matter comes in a completely different light.

The idea that the universe has a "beginning", an exact state from which everything was "created" inevitably means, if we are to pursue the idea logically, a "creator" or a "higher meaning". This in itself opens up for a Semitic anthropocentric view of nature, as well as a linear view of history.

A "cyclical" approach means that the starting point is our planet with its abundance of living organisms, and that it moves in a circle in its constant evolution, and not linearly with a clear "beginning" and an "end"...A consistent cyclical attitude cannot be based on a "Big-Bang" theory, as its course has no definite beginning or end.

National Socialism is the only political ideology which in modern times derives from the Aryan biocentric-cyclical worldview.