In fact, reading a Chick Tract and taking it to heart and then reading a Bible afterwards (with a sincere heart, that is) is the very best thing you could possibly do in your life right now.

Although hitler used darwinist principles to the 'T', I personally have never used any hitler arguments against darwinism solely because it undermines the fact that darwinists are perpetuating their own holocaust right now, and have been for decades, and their holocaust is even worse than hitler's. That holocaust is called 'abortion'. By using the hitler argument, IMO it makes it seem like we only need to worry about the other nefarious things darwinism will lead to and giving the impression that 'everything is fine and dandy right now regarding darwinism'; whilst ignoring darwinists' current crimes against humanity.

So for those reasons, I agree that there are better arguments to be made than the hitler argument. Such as that darwinism leads to the barbaric butchering of babies, right now.

No, God's Penis is not a biological organ. I never said God's Penis was the same as man's penis. Obviously it wouldn't be. That is why I pointed out God has a Holy, Righteous Penis. That is to say, it's not the same as man's corrupted, fleshy one.

As I said when this subject first came up, once again: Penises are not just for sex & peeing. It is only because man is evil that he thinks of penises exclusively in those terms.

Man is made in the image of God the Father. That is the primary reason why man has a penis.

You cannot insert your evil prejudicial ideas of man's penis onto God - which is exactly what you are doing. God's Penis is not equal to man's penis. It's really not hard to understand.

[Assuming this is true... _why_ should anyone else be punished for Adam&Eve's disobedience? Are you prepared to tell a 7 year-old kid suffering from bone cancer that she deserves pain because two people disobeyed and ate from the wrong fruit tree 6,000 years ago? That seems just and sane in your world view? ]

All people have sinned individually as well, meg. You do it with every post you make on this board.

I would tell the kid that she has cancer because of sin, but the good news is she can be saved and have eternal life via Jesus paying her sin debt if she accepts the payment.

However, in your darwinist worldview you have to tell her that death, destruction and corruption like cancer are great, and necessary aspects of 'creation' via darwinism. You have to tell her that she needs to hurry up and die so as to decrease the surplus population and improve the genepool. Then you have to top that off with telling her that when she dies he will turn into complete nothingness and her entire life will have been utterly meaningless, as are the lives of every other human who ever lived.

And you think all that is sane in your worldview

Tonight I was watching an old Stallone film called Cobra that I picked up in the Walmart bargain bin for 5 bucks a year or two ago but never bothered to watch until now.

I was pretty bored by what seemed like a very dumb plot...a huge cult of psycho killers committing tons of murders yet the police thought it was just one man and had no knowledge whatsoever of this cult's existence in their own city. It was way too far-fetched to believe. Plus, it didn't even make sense what the motivations of the cultists were, as this was unexplained for most of the movie other than to say they wanted a "New World Order".

But then something very interesting happened at the end...the psycho serial killer cult leader said: "We kill the weak so that the strong survive!" and then I instantly thought of this board and darwinism and how that character was pretty much doing exactly what you all believe darwinism can and should do.

From then on I could no longer see this as just a dumb movie, but had to realize how disturbing it is that something like this could actually happen because what the character said is completely in line with the darwinist mindset, and being a darwinist is so common these days that no one would even notice for quite a while when they start getting together and acting on all their darwinist beliefs.

Which brings me to my question: darwinists, do you relate to the villain from the Stallone film Cobra?

[A christian about YEC's: "but in my experience the YEC care more about defending their postion on the age of the earth than they do about core Christianity."]

You are an evil apostate, so it would be very unwise to take your experience as a good example of anything.

The core of Christianity is obediance to God. Instead of obeying God, you geode spend your life working iniquity against Him by calling Him a liar and His Word a lie, attacking His people, replacing His Word with the ungodly evolution fairytale, fraternizing with other evil men who agree with you (trying to delude yourself for psychological comfort that evil others telling you your apostasy is fine and dandy will make it ok with God) and promoting that satanic viewpoint to naive people so that they may be led astray and join you in Hell.

If you knew the slightest thing about core Christianity, geode, then you would be terrified of what God will do to such a worker of iniquity as yourself at the Judgement Seat of Christ. "The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge, but fools despite wisdom and instruction". That could have been written for you specifically, geode. That you revel in your debauchery instead of falling on your knees, begging for forgiveness, and repenting, is empirical proof that you are not of God.

[about a study showing increased porn consumption in conservative states]

The info doesn't really prove what the article writers is trying to spin it to prove. Hence, as usual, this article is more shady darwinist propaganda.

All those states analyzed have plenty of darwinists in them, and the darwinists are the ones who make up those stats of porn consumers.

To accurately say otherwise (ie: for the article in the OP to not be darwinist propaganda), darwinists would have to be segregated into their own state, and then make an analysis. But darwinists don't care about truth enough to do that. Apparently they can fool enough dumbasses to sympathize with them with propaganda articles like the one in the OP.

[Are seldom actual scientists. Or at least not scientists who work within the relevant disciplines. Most actual scientists agree that evolution is scientific.]

The 'scientists' you refer to in the quoted text are darwinists, not actual scientists. They may slap a misnomer 'scientist' label onto themselves, but they are certainly not scientists. Scientists obey the scientific method. darwinists, like the ones you refer to in the quoted text, do not.

[How often do you find biologists (and with no strong underlying religious motivations, only scientific ones) coming out against evolution and for creationism/ID? ]

All the darwinists you refer to support darwinism solely because darwinism is their religion and they have underlying religious motivations to zealously spread propaganda to promote their faith-based opinions about it to the exclusion of all other points of view, and suppress all other points of view. The people you are referring to are doing exactly the thing you complain about in the quoted text: coming out against creationism/ID due to their underlying religious motivations.

Satan buried all the fossils of the mythical ape-man in places that can never be found in order to test darwinists' faith in his religion of darwinism.

darwin a 'genius', ...way to worship your god again in grand idolatry, darwinists. [[roll]]

I wonder if they are gonna put signs around his 'heritage home' celebrating his/their incest heritage, showing all the places he banged his cousin in his incest/heritage home? Oh wait, that would be bad for PR and when something is bad for PR darwinists just sweep it under the rug and pretend it doesn't exist...so guess they won't be doing that.

What truly is terrible, terrible, is his promotion of darwinist propaganda and wanting it to have a monopoly so it can brainwash everyone to join his religion of darwinism and achieve his desired 100% darwinism belief rate/hivemind that all darwinists crave desperately. It's bad enough he doesn't care about damning his own soul, but wanting others to share in his damnation, well that's just sick.

Creationism is not equal to evolution. Rather, Creationism is far superior to evolution. Scientifically, morally, and spiritually. darwinism is an inherently evil worldview, whereas Creationism is an inherently good worldview.

Don't thank me because you decided by your own volition to entrench yourself further into the darwinist brainwashing machine and not care that when you die you will have to give an account to God, Whom controls your eternal destiny, for spending your life rejecting what He said. That's all on you, I have nothing to do with it. In fact, I encourage you to do the exact opposite of all that. I reject your thanks. You are not welcome to thank me for that.

If you ever wanna thank me for something, then first you must get yourself deprogrammed out of your darwinist mindset, start going to a Bible-believing Church, start reading the Bible and praying to God every day. Do all of that with sincerity. Then after you've done all those things for a few months, there is no doubt you will come to realize the error of (what would then become) your old ways, renounce darwinism, and know your eternal destiny is secure. All that would be the very best thing you would ever do in your entire existence.

If you do all those things, then you may come afterwards and thank me, and I will gladly accept your thanks.

The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge,But fools despise wisdom and instruction.

Teaching Darwinism in schools as if it is either the truth, or legitimate science, is a crime against humanity.

Darwinists will always be on a never-ending wild goose chase - with no proof whatsoever for any of their outlandish claims - because they are trying to fit the reality of what happened at the dawn of time in our Universe into a box that it cannot ever fit into.

Since the Universe and life in it were not, in reality, created by natural processes, it will never be possible to legitimately explain either the origin or diversity of life, or the Universe, using natural processes. There will never be any testable, repeatable, or observable evidence for the outlandish claims of Darwinism/evolution, because that reality has never actually existed, other than in the hearts and minds of Darwinists.

Darwinists are puzzled about why they haven't truly won and never will. They don't understand why the controversy remains despite them having insidiously infested every area of educational institutions and media; having a veritable monopoly to become propagandists and promote their opinions as 'facts' to everyone with inescapable, relentless bombardments of it at every turn. What is stated in the above paragraphs is the reason their endless Darwinist propaganda ultimately fails on enlightened persons, (although sadly, it does 'succeed' in socially engineering many to believe in Darwinism/evolution ) several decades after Darwinists though they had won. It is the reason why Darwinists can never truly win, and achieve a 100% belief rate/hivemind; which they wish and strive for.

Bottomline: You CANNOT legitimately - or with any proof - explain the origin or diversity of life & the Universe with natural processes since natural processes were not used to create it. So just stop trying.

The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge,But fools despise wisdom and instruction.

Darwinists fear, mock, and hate Chick Tracts solely because Chick Tracts utterly obliterate Darwinism every single time.