top

Eivind Berge #psycho eivindberge.blogspot.com

I think the reason why I find the 1977 petition against age of consent underwhelming is because they didn’t really have all that much sex hysteria to work with. All they had was the irrational law, some special discrimination against homosexuals, and the most egregious example of some men imprisoned for three years until trial and then getting a suspended sentence. That must have been shocking at the time for an age of consent violation, but today it is nothing.

They had nothing to say about the CSA hoax with supposed PTSD and no end to psychological problems from underage sex, because that superstition had not been invented yet.

So, it is immensely easier to criticize sex hysteria in 2025 than in 1977. No kidding, we should have a new and improved petition like that today! The only problem is I would be the only name on it. And I’m a nobody, and a bunch of Anonymouses are nobodies too, so it goes nowhere. Maybe Tom O’Carroll would sign too. Other intellectuals are cowards, despite all the more reason to have an uprising now.

Anonymous #sexist eivindberge.blogspot.com

Consensual, underaged sex does not cause significant damage, physically or psychologically, period. When are people going learn this? That just because one is below a certain age, they somehow someway more susceptible to “damage”? Unless by “damage” you mean to the negative reactions brought on by the teen girl or boy who was caught in the relationship. Maybe he or she got a slap on the wrist by their parents or got scolded to their room for the night. Maybe they weren’t allowed to have that slice of chocolate cake for dinner. Maybe he or she got grounded and couldn’t use their phone for a week or two. Sure, they call “damage”, I call it “laughable”. Whatever the case is, the teen gets to move on and resume his or her life, while the real victim are teacher who rot in prison for years for victimless sex.

If an article is going to claim “abuse” or emotional damage for a victim(s), please, for the love of God, ask the willing “victim(s)” what they thought of the encounter before you assume. I guarantee you that I will be right 99% of time that no damage was ever garnered in the first place. When will there be a day where the system will have handle out a copy of the Rind 1998 study to every judge on the bench? Soon?

Eivind Berge #psycho eivindberge.blogspot.com

That rant about sympathy for so-called sex offenders was not overly dramatic. It is what anyone should feel if they had empathy. Something is blocking that empathy. The delusion that consensual sex is extremely harmful just because it is called rape and and abuse. Either the normies are evil or they believe in this cultural superstition. I am still holding out hope that it is mostly the latter.