Antikurva #sexist

Antikurva #sexist sluthate.com

Can't read the whole article till later but that's a very irritating little jingle they got going:

"Whatever we wear, wherever we go, yes means yes and no means no"

Well how about

"Liar, liar, bras on fire"?

But if you really want to see the incel revolution, you got to start working on trippy little chants like these:

"However we look, whatever our height, sex with girls is our human right!"

Any takers?

43 comments

old comment by Swede

How can it be irritating that women have the right to their own bodies? Don’t you want to have the right to your own body? Well then, you have to fight for the same right for others.

Nope, no takers; you don't have a right to force yourself onto others.
If you have that right, male gays have a right to have sex with men.

Liar, liar, underpants on fire.
Oh, and we don't want to see any incel revolution. Try being decent human beings to everyone, regardless of gender, and you will make friends with women too. Friends is sometimes a step towards being in love, and then making love (but not if you have ulterior motives for being friends, of course).

Anti-kurva? You want skinny women? (Kurva means “curve” in Swedish.)

The biggest sluts around are, as usual, the incels.

old comment by Doubting Thomas

Further proof that "incels" think that all women owe them sex on demand. Otherwise they wouldn't be calling themselves "involuntarily celibate," which infers that it's not their fault they're not getting sex, it's that they're not getting their rightful share for some reason. Which is why I say there's no such thing as involuntarily celibate, since if they'd just change themselves instead of expecting all women to change, they might actually appeal to women.

It's also further proof they think of women as nothing more than sex toys. If they ever did get so lucky as to hook up with a real, live woman, they wouldn't make love to her, they'd masturbate using her body.

old comment by SpukiKitty

What all the others have said in response.

Also; We don't avoid you because of looks or height. We avoid you because you are all repulsive excuses for human beings.

Elliot Rodger was PHYSICALLY a very attractive youth...but his personality, misogyny and general nastiness was why girls avoided him like the plague!

Davy Jones of the Monkees was extremely short but, in his youthful prime, he's had girls allllll over him! Being dinky is not a barrier! In fact, short guys (and gals) tend to look youthful and cute longer. Shortness is cuteness! Just ask John Philpott and his character, Courage the Ladybug boy ....
image image
....from Sid & Marty Krofft's early 1970s kiddie-fantasy show, The Bugaloos! Gawd! I could just eat that cute little hottie up (granted, he looks nothing like that now.)....
image
....On a side-note, I think I.Q. The Grasshopper was a babe, too! Of course, those familiar with the show will hear ad nauseum about the babealiciousness of Joy! Being a hetero gal making a point about males, I'll just post pics of Courage & I.Q. because there's not enough "Male Bugaloos were hot" in the Bugaloos fandom (Yes, there's a fandom).

Anyway; Courage was a guy who was very short and very cute. There!

This whole Male Supremacist thing seems to be what happens when guys watch 1980s-early 1990s Teen-Sex comedies and take them as reality.

Y'know? All those plots of the geeky, socially inept, uncouth guy who pines for the babealicious cheerleader who initially avoids him like the plague but said dork wins her heart and genitals in the end without doing anything to make himself a better person (the rival is also a nasty bullying jock. Those movies were like Evil vs. Evil, man.)?

Revenge Of The Nerds is not a documentary!

What the heck!....
image image
....I'll put Joy The Butterfly here, anyway...along with Harmony The Bee, just because.

old comment by

"Antikurva" reminds me of socialists.

They both love to make up rights that don't actually exist, whether it's the right to "free college" or the right to sex with girls, they are both fundamentally what's known as "positive rights" which basically mean "I want other people to do stuff for me or I'm going to use the force of the government to compel them to".

Only negative rights are real rights. They are a prohibition on what people or the government can do to you. (no theft, no rape, no murder, no tyranny, government has to earn the consent of the people in some way to be legitimate, no censorship unless it's a completely private platform etc.)

If the "Sluthaters" really want sex, they should either petition the government to make prostitution legal (anti-prostitution laws violate negative rights) or engage in civil disobedience and fuck prostitutes anyway. It's not like most people actually get caught and even if they do it's not that easy to prosecute since the jury needs to be convinced beyond reasonable doubt. Any doubt over monetary exchange specifically for sex should result in a not guilty verdict, same if the jury decides to just ignore the evidence and go for jury nullification, something that should be promoted by the way given how many dumb laws exist today.

There is no excuse for what ER did.

@Spuki

"Elliot Rodger was PHYSICALLY a very attractive youth"

Perhaps but there was also a feminine feel to him. Maybe that works on homosexuals I dunno, straight women however overwhelmingly want men that feel masculine.

He didn't work on that at all. Just observe the way he talks.

Antikurva #sexist sluthate.com

43 comments

Confused?