@Forscience314
As a somebody who actually is for scientificly based rule system, your strawman is seriously pathetic. Using iq scores as some ultimate measure of inteligence, prohibiting people from breeding, all the "and it would bring aobut a happily ever after", like you`re a 5 year old, making up your fairy tale.
You don`t have a vision, you have a bunch of straw and authoritarian intentions which you would try to masquerade as somehow "scientific".
I`m all for the idea that there should be no more career politicians and that all governing bodies should be drafted to positions from the internal university elections, that stupidity should be publicly stigmatised and facts enforced instead of always contested by people who have no business contesting them, in some form of conciousness-soup we have now over the social media. I`d rather you were forced to get an education, a degree and then get the right to publicly dispute if say, global warming exists but even for such a thing, you would need to compeltely change the current system in many countries to allow for free, public higher education with no regards to the age of people enrolling and somehow practically unlimited space for people in each subject major. Because it`s still about the human rights and you`d better be able to coherently present the really utopian vision to the masses who might not want to, you know, give up their stranglehold on voting rights to move them up to just a very specific social group, which would be effectively trusted with making decisions for all of us. How would you make as sure as possible that this group would`ve not easily fallen to corruption and nepotism? Scientists tend to be the idealistic and humanitarian types but there`s no telling that it would remain such way if you suddenly tie a very real legislative power to their positions. We do already try to give out positions by merit, in general but as you probably are aware, it works as it does... That would not change unless you have some briliant solution for us all. I`m all for an ai replacing the fallible and popularity contest prone US justice system but that is basically all I will agree with and for so called victimless crimes there should still be some sort of an organic appeal, cause the dumb machine just slapped a 3 year sentence on a senior crossing in a wrong space. Then again I`m a pole, broguht up in a country where you are definitely not judged by the jury of your peers and isntead from the codex, I prefer it myself since you can`t wow the codex and can`t make emotional appeal to the codex but good luck convincing most others about it.
Yes, convince, the operative word here, because at this point you have utterly faield to convince a person who is basically sympathetic to at least your most vague idea that the country should be ruled from universities. Now have fun with those who genuinely disgree with even your most basic idea.