You've been propagandised to the extreme. There is nothing wrong in feeling sexual attraction to children- in my personal opinion, it would be unnatural not to be attracted to them. They are sexy and can be very beautiful. You are only a part of a small minority within the human race, that's all.
Why is modern law so concerned with sex, or as i call it sessions of sensual, erotic intimacy stimulation.
but anyway back to the point...
Criminal law should be focused on harm, forcible confinement, depriving parents from their children i.e. kidnapping, the transmittance of sickness, abuse/hurt
Anything that is of pleasure, caressing, loving embraces of stimulative friction, fooling around, while smiles and laughter are abound.....
This has nothing to do with criminality!
I would agree that in the first instance that their is unhappiness, hurt,
discomfort, or force than yes intervention would be absolutely be the proper course of action, but that is already the case in anything humans/youth/the elderly do... we protect each other within society, that's just what we do...
erotic stimulus under 16yo is not "maybe", or "defiantly not", or painful, or wrong.... IT'S AN ABSOLUTE GUARANTEE! and the criminal law goes and pokes it's nose in and says NO WAY!
Sexual peak in males is 17/18 years old... That's the top! surely 10 years younger and 10 years older from the top suggests a very sexual being... That would mean 8 - 28 is high sexual needs/desires...
Therefore, given the physiological true nature of youthful males... could a case not be made that it is the Police/Justice/and the law in general that are the criminals in shaming, punishing, and barbarically imposing their will that "this pleasure" will not be tolerated?!!
Who and what does the law think they are? imposing such atrocities and shame, into the the minds of boys and young men!
No one is above the law, provided what,? ... That the law is genuine, healthy, and tolerating to basic human conditions...
if not, I suggest to you that it's not law at all but a mean spirited opportunistic, sadistic group trying to control and profit (jails for profit) while looking to psychiatrists "ON THE TAKE"
In the manosphere, there are many men who say, "I try to leave women better than I found them." This idea was debunked by Heartiste. Women don't age well, and having sex with men and then breaking up with them tends to take a toll on them. Even if they enjoy the experience, that will just produce wistfulness later, when they're post-wall and stuck with a guy who doesn't turn them on as much.
I'm not aware that homosexual relationships work under the same premise as a heterosexual marriage, that the cost of enjoying the kitten phase is that you have to take care of the grown cat. (As Victor Pride writes, "It's a tradeoff, she gives you her good years and you put up with her in her bad years. Never take a woman already in her bad years.")
People err in thinking that homosexual relationships or pederastic relationships operate according to the same principles as straight relationships. The lack of potential to have kids is a key difference. Even though Roosh seems to be cutting ties with me at this point, I have to acknowledge that he was smart to point out during Milogate that gays and straights are indeed different, and that we shouldn't hold them both to the same standards in their relationships. Their needs are different, their culture is different, their relationship dynamics are different, etc.
It probably is a lot more possible for a man-boy relationship to leave the boy better off, because his time hasn't been wasted the way that a girl's time is wasted during her years of peak fertility and beauty if a man pumps her and dumps her. I think we should call out the antis when they assume that boys are just like girls, and that they have the same vulnerabilities and need to be protected in the same way that a father would guard his maiden daughter's virtue. That's some politically correct nonsense.
Did BoyChat ever consider a mission statement? A mission statement to be posted in bold up-top the page?
To give clarity, and objectivity to the site...
I would suggest that the site does not exists to encourage abuse, but rather prevent it, to open up dialogue, to challenge present day scientific assumptions, and nativity...
To discount the narrative that intimacy, and erotic pleasures before 16 should be criminal, or is psychologically traumatizing, abusive, and evil...
That excessive humiliation, and over the top "scandal", with brutal law enforcement intervention at the bequest of "mental Health" IS the sick psychosis, and perversion that destroys lives...
That Universities cherry pick in the realm of political correctness, than make factual and scientific whatever makes them shine the most, thus affording them the monies to pursue incorrect paths in "absolute virtue" of falsehoods.
Anyway, just thought it be nice to have a clear idea of what the mandate is here at BChat, so as to be open and as transparent in the logic, science, testimonials, and proof that present day justice is basically ignoring making them the illegal and criminal demons... and here's why...
Anyway just a thought, a "mission statement" for BoyChat 25 years proud!
When a boy has a cold his body makes him sneeze, the cold is blown out of the body by way of mucus goo that has captured the bacterial intruders...
When a boy is sad he gets teary eyed, anxiety is apparent, and a certain amount of self confidence is lost, and vulnerability is exposed...
When a boy is scared...
When a boy tired...
When a boy is determined, he...
BUT when a boy is horny, sexually desirous... Society doesn't know! We shut that entire huge part right down... It doesn't exist... it's dirty, shameful, and unbecoming of a proper boy...
Imagine how ignorant, cruel, and barbaric that is... Society just simply shuts it down, shames it to death, and punishes like "murder" any friend that would have entertained it's powerful human trait.
It's frankly astonishing, i know i'm not telling you anything you didn't already know... but seriously, the fundamental physiological
hardening penis asking/craving for stimulus, affection, and satisfaction just wished away by a cruel but very "proper" society instructed by a great school of academia and justice.
When you truly think about it... How impossible is it that we sit where we are in this day 'n' age... that loving young men that shared in passion sit in prison, rotting in shame while Cantor and the like, dribble and spew toxic voodoo and irreversible damage.
We should be doing everything and anything to overturn the indoctrination of the young- with the classic 'good touch vs bad touch".
These days they are indoctrinating ever younger children with this nonsense.
Even before they enter primary schooling.
In kindergarten or daycare, this obnoxious notion is being infused into the impressionable little minds.
A child that is positive about physicality at three may assume the opposing views at four- it is what they teach them.
This is truly sad.
I think people are more fascinated with pedophiles than ever before. Back before the registry existed, there could be sex offenders hanging out in your neighborhood that you didn't even know about. They would hand out candy on Halloween just like anyone else, and no one would be the wiser. Pedophilia was effectively invisible. It wasn't talked about. Also, child porn wasn't even all that common, because we didn't have the Internet.
Now, we have more than 700,000 sex offenders on the registry. People can exclaim, "Wow, I didn't know we had a child pornography trafficker living right in our neighborhood!"
I think to some extent, people realize, "700,000 sex offenders can't be wrong." Also, they don't feel revulsion toward sex offenders, even though they say, "That's horrible and disgusting!" Rather, they can't get enough of shows like Special Victim Unit. They want to immerse themselves in it.
My view is, there are a lot of pedo-curious people out there. They want to know what all the hubbub is, that's making so many people want to download child porn, or have sex with little kids, or whatever. They're tired of feeling left out.
For a long time now, people have been sexualizing children. There are so many women (single moms, etc.) who are basically whores, that obviously their daughters are going to copy them, and want to wear the same tight/skimpy clothes and adopt the same sexualized stances, etc. so they can get attention too. Also, the Romeo-and-Juliet laws, coupled with the feminist injunction against slut-shaming, amount to society's sanctioning teen sexual activity.
The bottom line is that more and more, I think a lot of people want to experience sex with kids. They want to at least experience it vicariously. That's why they love to repost clickbait articles about adult-child sex. Women want to have sex with boys, men want to have sex with young girls, and homosexual men definitely want to have sex with boys (they barely even try to hide it). (As for women with younger girls, that doesn't get talked about much, because it doesn't fit into the feminist narrative, but I guarantee it will someday be a popular segment of the child porn market, once that's legalized.)
Another factor in this is that hebephilia and ephebophilia have been subsumed under pedophilia, even though the official change wasn't made to the DSM. That also tends to make pedophilia seem more alluring, because it includes not only attraction to the prepubescent but to the pubescent as well.
I think at this point, a lot of people would at least like to mess around with a kid to see what it's like.
The question is best answered by a question.
Why is society so hysteric about sensual erotic pleasuring?
Why did this society make a massive industry on invading youths and their right to be physically affectionate?
Why do psychology academics feels so brave and pompous in promoting false science and exaggerating the shame of sexuality of a desirous youth?
Why do women flock to employment that have this fantasy of protecting boys from the very stimulus they desire, crave, and seek?
Do you think pedophilia is normal? Why ask the question? for what does it really mean anyway?
Do you think youth under 16 are horny, and have right to be sensual?
It's a disease?.. Could it be a cure? Could boys that are hyper, and un-attentive and given "pills", and pharmaceuticals be better off being sexual?
A natural fact in nature? the fact that it is in nature is then "natural.... do boys under 16 have erection and like penal stimulation?
What do you think?... I think the subject is criminally over blown, the hysterics shame and punishment that have been a part of this society is unforgivable, and justice and mental health have a lot to be responsible for, and should be made to pay restitution for their intervention and over the top fabrication of ignorant conclusions!!!!!!!!!!!
In this essay I explore the idea that there are two kinds of virtue: the 'negative' virtue of not doing harm, and 'positive' virtue of actively doing good.
Virtuous Pedophiles have been very successful in promoting 'negative' virtue, encouraging paedophiles to avoid any contact with children that could result in feelings of love or desire. But I argue that paedophiles often greatly enrich the lives of children they are close to, and that this is as much Virtue as that promoted by Virtuous Pedophiles.
However, the good things we do for children can not be rung up to the credit of 'paedophilia' since we are obliged to do them whilst keeping our sexuality secret.
At the conclusion of this essay I try to flesh out a vision of a web site where caring paedophiles can anonymously share and feel proud about the good things they have done for children they care about, a site that would make visible the good things we do, and promote a vision of paedophilia which maybe allows us self-respect and gives us credit for the goodness of our love.
The site is just a dream at the moment. I have no idea whether whether it is a good idea, whether it is wanted by the paedophile community, or whether it would work.
[Various posts from a thread on a paedophile message board]
I don't think that many 5 year old boys..
don't already know how to masturbate.
I know I was shooting blanks on a
regular basis. We just knew not to
talk about it in front of adults..
[...]
But I have said a number of times that if the
parents aren't going to teach their kids about
sex, then it is up to the schools to do it.
I know Kindergarten is a bit too late to start,
but it would be a great help to a number of
youngsters to get some good instruction on
how to do it.
[...]
Of course, then again, if parents were smarter, generally speaking of course, then they would teach their kids about it themselves, and I say -- and I'm not saying this *just* to be erotic or whatever, but I say that teaching them through example and hands-on teaching is best, honestly. Not only does that teach them about it really well, but that would also be a wonderful bonding experience and leave them with great memories of how they first learned to masturbate.