FSTDT

MackQuigley #racist mackquigley.wordpress.com

As Ham’s descendants after the flood moved southward from Ararat toward Africa, some improperly settled in the Near East. To oust them, God gives their lands to Abrahamic tribes, beginning with Moabite and Ammonite descendants of Lot, and then to the Israelites.

There is no indication that all giants were ever eradicated, but rather that the number of them appearing in the Hammite population eventually waned as the population normalized over time. Perhaps a similarity can be drawn from the way super-longevity in humans also attenuated in the generations after the flood. For example, in David’s time there was “an Egyptian, a man of great stature, five cubits high” 1 Chronicles 11:23, which is about 7.5 feet tall, and there was Goliath who was almost 9 feet tall (1 Sam. 17:23). But these giants were both small compared to Og who lived 500 years earlier, who was over 13 feet tall (Deut. 3:11). This would suggest that giantism was most notable in Ham’s first generations, but that the expression of it declined steadily over time.

Since Noah had pure genetics (Genesis 6:9), the only way for giantism to have survived the flood and made its reappearance among Ham’s descendants would be if Ham’s mother and/or his wife were genetic carriers for it.

It is conceded that Ham was Noah’s true son, but that does not mean he had the same mother as Shem and Japheth. In fact, the disgraceful way Ham treated his father’s nakedness demonstrates that Noah’s wife was not his mother, but rather the mother of the other two sons who showed her respect. Ham’s black descendants are entirely foreign from both Caucasians and Orientals, which two races by comparison have slight differences between them. In fact, since triplets are unlikely, yet Noah had all three sons in the same year of his life (Genesis 5:32), it is all but certain that Ham was born of a different mother.

This means a Negro concubine of Noah contaminated her son Ham with giantism. Alternatively, Ham took a Negro wife and she was the source of the contamination. Or perhaps, it was both.

The fact that giantism is a human carried genetic trait makes it much less fantastic and otherworldly than the UFO sensationalism would suggest.

MackQuigley #fundie mackquigley.wordpress.com

Dealing with godless morons is not worth the effort. It is axiomatic that God created the world:

“For every house is builded by some man; but he that built all things is God.” Hebrews 3:4.

Any clown who denies this and calls himself an “atheist” is announcing his own dishonesty. Why would anybody waste time conversing with liars?

There is only one scientific statement on origins in existence, which is as follows:

“In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.” Genesis 1:1.

Any other statement than that is unscientific nonsense.

(1) It’s not scientific to say, “there is no creation, everything is an illusion” because if you act on that belief and get behind the wheel of a car, you’ll be dead before you’ve gone 10 blocks across town. You can’t live and drive through red-lights at 100 miles per hour – it can’t be done. If you claim everything is an illusion, you’re either dead or a hypocrite who refuses act on your beliefs.

(2) It’s not scientific to say “the universe came from nothing without God” because the LAW of the Conservation of Matter and Energy which dictates that the sum total of matter and energy remains fixed. Ergo, nothing remains nothing, it doesn’t suddenly become a universe! It’s non-scientific baloney to claim everything in the universe just popped into existence – because that can’t be done according to the scientific laws that govern the natural universe.

(3) It’s not scientific to say, “the universe has always existed” because of the LAW of Entropy which dictates that everything goes to equilibrium over time. The universe is not a uniformly cold, grey, static suspension of motionless ashes – but that’s exactly the heat-death it would suffer if it had always existed. Only a non-scientific nutcase would claim that the universe is eternal because he’d have to ignore the LAW of Entropy that governs the natural world.

Numbers 1, 2, and 3 are all unscientific. There is only 1 other possibility. Because it is the only remaining possibility – and any other solutions are logical impossible – it must be accepted as the true answer. Thus by the deductive scientific principle of process of elimination we can dogmatically assert as absolute truth:

(4) The universe was Created Supernaturally.

Therefore supernatural forces are not conjecture, myth, and ghost stories – but a bedrock truth that underlies the existence of our entire universe. And of course, it is not the realm of science to make known who that supernatural Creator is; that is the realm of religion. Therefore science – which deals with the natural world – has to step aside when it comes to studying ultimate truth and knowledge. The scientists are all out of their league – they are babies when it comes to understanding reality. Every experiment and test and calculation of natural forces that they conduct will never give them an understanding of that which is supernatural – and yet the supernatural created everything.

This is check-mate. But the lying atheists won’t admit it because they know where it next leads – it leads to them being called into account and judged by God for their sin. This is because anybody who thinks he is self-righteous, and doesn’t have guilt before his Creator, is without excuse since he knows he has broken the law and commandments written on his heart and mind.

MackQuigley #racist mackquigley.wordpress.com

(RSTDT won the coin toss this time)

God’s solution to the racial problem after the flood was to make Ham’s cursed seed segregated and subjugated (Genesis 9:25), to divide Babylon (Genesis 11), and to drive Ham out of the middle east over time by Abraham’s descendants.

So one of the Bible’s many themes is how God has allowed a long struggle in human kind to continue by and against the savage descendants of the sons of God, including Cain’s seed, and Ham’s descendants. This has created humans who have sinful flesh and need entirely new bodies. This makes the victory of Jesus Christ all the more relevant – he became a curse for us (Galatians 3:13) and died and rose again gaining the victory over sinful flesh: “For what the law could not do, in that it was weak through the flesh, God sending his own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh” Romans 8:3.

Thus the first gentile to be saved in Acts is an Ethiopian eunuch (Acts 8:27). Christian salvation is open to all, no matter what racial background, the entire Church will all join into the new body of Christ at the resurrection. However, of the nations that survive the tribulation, any Hammites will have to enter the kingdom of Christ as eunuchs since the Hammite line will forever cease in eternity (Matthew 19:12; Isaiah 56:3).
This brings us back around to the end-times indicator of being like the days of Noah. Yes, today the world is experiencing again, like in Noah’s day, the proliferation of Negro criminality, violence, fornication, and race-mixing - and this is a sign that we are near the end.

MackQuigley #fundie mackquigley.wordpress.com

(FSTDT won the coin flip this time.)

How is it Cain was able to get a wife after he already left his home and went into the land of the East? It is suggested that Cain married a daughter of Adam and Eve and that incest was permissible at this early stage of human history. Nevertheless, prior to Cain’s departure no mention was made of Adam and Eve giving birth to any daughters, in fact, their third son Seth had not even been born yet (Genesis 4:25). If other sons of God existed, then it would explain where Cain got his wife in the land of the east.

Note too this verse: “And the LORD said, My spirit shall not always strive with man, for that he also is flesh: yet his days shall be an hundred and twenty years.” Genesis 6:3. He also is flesh? Who else is flesh in this comparison?

The little word “also” is very instructive. The verse seems to indicate that God’s spirit attempted to govern the other races of “sons of God” but they were too flesh-driven; yet God had hoped to maintain a relationship with those of Adam’s seed and strove to do so for a long time, but gave up because Adam’s line “also” got corrupted by becoming too flesh-obsessed,and this due especially to their racial miscegenation.

12. Can a human being have an altered state of consciousness in which they experience a s*****l relationship with an angel/demon that seems real but is not literal? How can one tell the difference? Are angels/demons able to implant suggestive and potent imagery into human minds?

Ok, the “Discernment Group” is getting more and more sensational, lurid, and coarse with the types of questions they are asking. What is the “Discernment Group” planning on doing with all this information, are they going to attempt to write a “Kama-Sutra” for Nephilim? Yikes, I’ve had enough.

Of course, the ones who are promoting the Nephilim nonsense (that is, the alleged existence of invisible demons that try to impregnate women) are the ones to blame for inviting salacious questions of this nature. They are inventing a weird mythology that has nothing to do with reality.

The question I would ask is, if all these Nephilim babies have been born, then please show us the giants in the land — (hint: go to an NBA game).

“There were giants in the earth in those days; and also after that, when the sons of God came in unto the daughters of men, and they bare children to them, the same became mighty men which were of old, men of renown.” Genesis 6:4.

Notice: The giants arose “when” i.e., exactly when, meaning this was the cause, when the sons of God “came in unto” i.e., they copulated with the fair women, and “the same” i.e., the mulatto offspring that arose when this happened, i.e., because of this happening, then those offspring became the mighty men. The statement “and also after that” implies that the giants are these offspring since their first fathers would have died in the flood., i.e., the sons of God produced these initial offspring, some of which happened to be giants, and yet giants kept showing up in even after the flood, i.e., certain progeny identified with Ham – see Deut 2:11, 20; 3:11-13, etc.

Does any of this mean that Blacks can’t get saved? Of course not, black souls certainly can be saved. In fact, one of the first New Testament gentiles saved was an Ethiopian, but take careful note – he was a eunuch: “a man of Ethiopia, an eunuch of great authority under Candace queen of the Ethiopians” Acts 8:27. Saved men can come from all races at the present time because their souls are saved and they will get new bodies at the rapture. However, the line of Ham will not continue on into eternity; it will dead-end when those Black who survived the tribulation, and who are found worthy to enter the millennial kingdom, being allowed to enter, but only as eunuchs – see, Matthew 19:12, Isaiah 56:4-5. (“there shall be no more the Canaanite in the house of the LORD of hosts.” Zechariah 14:21; “Prepare slaughter for his children for the iniquity of their fathers; that they do not rise, nor possess the land, nor fill the face of the world with cities.” Isaiah 14:21 (cf. Gen.4:17))

TheMackQuigleyReport. #fundie mackquigley.wordpress.com

For as long as Whites and Blacks lived side by side in the United States, there have been laws on the books forbidding miscegenation. In those days adultery and fornication and sodomy were all also illegal. At least 95% of the people had no problem with these laws – they simply married somebody of their own race and stayed faithful. And getting a divorce was difficult – you were expected to remain in the lifetime commitment you had made.

Well those “brilliant” legal minds who sit as the black robed judges in America decided to throw out all the laws criminalizing adultery, fornication, sodomy, and race-mixing – and made divorce as simple as filling out a form. What possible rationale did these crazy judges offer to justify these acts of absolute lunacy? In a word: RIGHTS.

According to the Supreme Court of the United States, everyone has the “fundamental right” to copulate with anybody else. Two sodomites who continued to fornicate even after the police caught them in the act, must not only be charged with no crime – they deserve “respect” according to SCOTUS.

According to SCOTUS it is “cruel and unusual punishment” to execute a sick monster who rapes a little baby. That would be against his “Constitutional rights” so his sentence must be commuted.

The homos are demanding full “marriage equality” as they term their aberrant notion of sodomites “marrying” other sodomites, and lesbians “marrying” other lesbians. What is their precedent for demanding such a thing?