ID really isn't about finding God. This in itself is a common mis-characterization For the most part ID'rs simply put forth there is some kind of "direction", "intelligence", "self-organization" taking place in biology - which so-far "undirected" "random" "non-intelligent" organization has not explained. This especially was demonstrated regarding the recent human genome project which had materialists like yourself and Michael Shermer assuring the world it would cement Darwinian biology forevermore. In fact, the genome project confirmed what ID'rs had predicted, not what the Darwinists had predicted.
What is a fine trick is playing the definition games you like to play here. For starters, science is about putting forth hypothesis that most readily explains the scientific data collected and analyzed. And if there is anything we know most intimately as human beings, it is our consciousness and our intelligence. In fact our science depends upon our intelligence. And what ID'rs are observing naturally in biological structures is the signature of intelligence i.e. self-organization, irreducible complexity, non-random direction. This is the scientific data your Skeptical prejudices that you share with Dawkins and Shermer deny. This is the scientific data that would have led you to predict different results from the human genome project. But you continue to ignore that data. You continue to deny it. Even though it is readily accessible for anyone willing to look at it.
What we also discovered in quantum physics 80 years ago, is there is a non-material aspect to the reality we experience. In fact, on a very fundamental level ie. the very fabric of reality is made up of particles that are not real until we actually observe those particles. We have also discovered in psychology and in parapsychology non-local aspects of human consciousness. Again, this is scientific data that your Skeptical prejudices simply ignore or insist cannot exist.