Wives commanded to submit to un-Christ-like husbands:
A. The wife must submit to her abusive husband "in the same way" that a slave submits to an abusive master: 1 Peter 2:18 + 3:1
B. No husband is sinless and if a wife need not obey her husband because he sins, it effectively nullifies the command to submit.
C. Masters are to be just, fair, Col.4:1. But if not, submission is still required: 1 Peter 2:18
44 comments
The insanity of treating ones spouse as a slave aside, what sense does this make?
If the woman is like a slave to her husband as stated in A), then how can she judge the husband's sin to be such that she doesn't have to obey? Slaves don't have that option, so where's the consistancy?
Not to mention that in C) she has to obey no matter how just or fair he is. If he is being unjust or unfair, isn't that being sinful?
The Bible: The more I read the less I comprehend.
It doesn't say that it's conditional, but it doesn't say that it's not either. I would think that a kind, loving God would want to save women in an abusive relationship. If the husband doesn't love and respect her like Jesus loves the Church, the wife should not have to submit to her husband as she submits to God. Precisely because no one is righteous, no not one.
Uh, it also says people should follow the law... and it's illegal to beat people, and it's illegal to let someone beat your kids so... even Biblically it is correct to leave an abusive slimbag.
Also, we are all to submit to each other... that means no beating, for crying out loud! Fundies make me *headdesk* *headdesk* *headdesk*
Abuse=wrong
Leaving abusive husband=right
Call me "radical" and "freaky", but I prefer a woman with a personality, feelings, intelligence, and a sense of humor, not a robot.
For those of you having trouble with B, it's saying, "No husband is sinless, but a wife still has to follow him anyway. After all, how can women refuse to follow someone unless he's sinless? No one is sinless. We couldn't bond our women to slavery if they only had to follow sinless men!"
Don´t expect many people to submit to a religion that singles out people by default. Among other things, because you´re nullifying the notion of sin. If the wife is to submit to the husband for no good reason, she is not asuming any personal responsability for her acts.
Yet one more reason why the Bible should never be used as the law of the land,
it was written by a bunch of misogynistic Bronze Age assholes looking to justify their prejudices.
Beside, I'd bet these retards would be up in arms if the government tried to protect Sharia law in their neighborhoods.
Husbands, love your wives and do not be harsh with them. Colossians 3:19
If you beat your wife you do not love her and therfore you are disobeying the bible.
So, the American colonies under the British Empire should have never rebelled?
I agree. It went horribly wrong.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.