"ACLU should be sued"
And who, pray, will pay for the necessary legal muscle to do that, hmmmmm...?! Yeah. It's not as if there's never been a history of other legal firms - paid by others who thought as you do - who tried to do so against said ACLU.
(emph-ass-is added):
"Its very Communist roots tell us how divisive and evil the ACLU truly is. We should post everyone’s name who contributes to that evil communist organization and Alinskyite them. The good things they have done are far outdone by the evillike representing NAMBLA for free in the rape case of that little boy by the pervert who absorbed all the “how to” info from NAMBLA publication. ACLU has been trying to destroy the Boy Scouts and mainstream homosexuality. Their vision for the US is a bathhouse hellhole with old atheists able to legally bed little boys. That old ACLU alum, Ginsberg, wants to lower the age of consent to 12....all for the frisky, sex-obsessed, youth obsessed, narcissistic, homosexual men.
savagesusie here has clearly never heard of - thus never figured out the moral of - the phrase 'On a hiding to nothing'. Least of all any anti-LGBT fundie American who has claimed that 'all gays are paedophiles' has come here to the UK, and said the same to the faces of gay men - with their legal representatives and members of the press present. Not with the UK's hyper-savage & ultra-brutal libel and slander laws, anyway.
"for attacking his freedom to teach fact and Truth"
'Fact'. You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means, savagesusie. Oh, and in terms of religious belief (certainly the stock it places in it's claims), the words 'Truth' and Fact: The phrase 'Mutually Exclusive'. It exists for a reason.
'Reason'. Aye, there's the rub...! One last thing...:
http://mccannexposure.wordpress.com/2010/02/16/republican-list-of-paedophiles-shocking/
The phrase 'Those who shout the loudest have the most to hide' exists for a reason too.
@Hannibal
"So are they fascist or communist, since they are two completely different things?"
Well, that's right-wing doublethink for you. Proof?:
"ACLU has been trying to destroy the Boy Scouts and mainstream homosexuality."
How, pray, can the ACLU - who supposedly support NAMBLA and it's cause, as per your claims - be for, yet simultaneously be against something...?
...if NAMBLA's members themselves aren't homosexual. I refer you to the above link.
No 'context' required, savagesusie. Nor is trying to excuse yourself - or claiming you didn't know what you were thinking, mid-rant - allowed. You've contradicted yourself, thus completely annihilated your own argument.
As FSTDT's resident Argument Annihilator, I think so much, I scare myself sometimes...!