(AyeDeeEightchD)
You Can't Talk About Valid Arguments on r/Prochoice
I had an amazing thought today. It was a discussion for prochoice people that I was excited to share.

The argument: "If financial readiness or mental readiness is able to be a sole reason for having an abortion, can a man force a woman to have an abortion? Does he hold the same rights to be unprepared as a woman does?"

As I do with any subreddit I post to, I read the posting rules to r/prochoice and was confused to find that you are NOT allowed to post anything about the "non-pregnant partner" having a say in an abortion.

If there are any mods from prochoice here, I ask you why does this rule exist? If there are many people willing to make arguments beyond the labor of physically carrying a child, then why can we not discuss how this extends to men in the picture?

What do you guys think about the rule?

(AndromedaPrometheum)
The unwritten rule of prochoice side is: The only time a man has a say on abortion is when he says "yes dear" to a woman that wants to abort how he feels about the abortion has to be in line with the woman wants or else he is a sexist pig that should be castrated, and an oppressor colonizer agent of the patriarchy. So basically, men's choice is to agree with the woman, period. You are welcome.

(ILoveStrawberries2)
These are the people who like to say “no uterus no opinion”. Pro choicers are sexist towards men.

(ARWatson1989)
The pro-abortion thoughts on the male perspective of the situation are ever changing and in weird ways. They say we can have no opinion, but it was men who decided roe in the first place. Now they are say Amy Barrett is the reason for roe being removed but it's somehow the "patriarchy" at fault. Oh and apparently men can get pregnant now but still have no opinion. The mental gymnastics it takes to be pro-abortion is wild