@"San Lumen";p="39527708"
How is gay adoption harmful?
The purpose of adoption is to rebuild broken families. Gay couples aren't families. Therefore, "gay adoption" doesn't serve the purpose of adoption. That's harmful because the purpose of adoption is good, so failing to serve it is bad. Also, gays are evil so their influence in society should be limited as much as possible in general in order to contain the spread of the evil and their influence over a child would be quite enormous.
9 comments
Going even beyond mere 'adoption': biological fathers. In this instance, Sir Elton John & David Furnish. Their sons are theirs . All concerned are doing fine.
So if this proves there's nothing wrong with gay men being actual fathers, adoption proves even more that the only things 'harmed' are the feelings of this... thing .
And as the law doesn't care about your feelings...!
So, you need parents to be “broken” by lost children or infertility to be adoption-eligible, then? Because gay couples are already infertile in their own way…
We should probably see what actual Mormon codes say about adoption, though (that’s where they probably got “Moroni” from).
The purpose of adoption is to rebuild broken families.
No it’s not. It is for getting children in need a (hopefully) loving and healthy and stable home. Period.
Gay couples aren't families.
Yes they are. Just like my friend and her boyfriend and two cats are a family. Just like me and my girlfriend and her cat and my mouse. We are a family.
Therefore, "gay adoption" doesn't serve the purpose of adoption.
If an LGBT couple can provide a child with love and support and stability, then yes it does.
That's harmful because the purpose of adoption is good, so failing to serve it is bad.
That’s a nice circular argument.
Also, gays are evil so their influence in society should be limited as much as possible in general in order to contain the spread of the evil and their influence over a child would be quite enormous.
Oh how awful! The kid might not be a homophobic POS or might even be LGBT themselves! /s
So basically you can’t really explain why you think same sex couples adopting children is bad other than “ew butt sex!”
Have you ever even met an LGBT person or is it only shitty 80s and 90s movies and bigoted religious assholes informing your opinion?
"Also, gays are evil so their influence in society should be limited as much as possible in general in order to contain the spread of the evil and their influence over a child would be quite enormous.”
This would be your actual premise, tossed in as an afterthought. You have no use for gays, fine, don’t marry one. Tell everyone what your idol, Paul, had to say. But don’t pretend you get to shape secular society for your superstitions.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.