Men should stick to blue and women should stick to pink. We dress babies in the right colors so why can't we do the same as adults? It is a sin to wear clothes that belongs to the opposite sex and women are particularly bad at violating this rule. Men don't wear dresses (apart from a few sickos) so why should females wear pants? It's a sin! Most women today are transvestites and abominations. [...]
So please dress like a man if you are a man and dress like a woman if you are woman and stop flaunting your satanic lifestyle and defiance of God. Thanks.
104 comments
Well, this is an obvious troll, but if any dumb fundy actually swallows it, I suggest they go out and find the nearest lady cop and tell her she's an abomination for wearing blue trousers, and see whst happens.
Anyone else have trouble with the tone switches? You are "sickos, abominations, and transvestites" then the next paragraph "please, thanks"???
So my socks and underwear that accidently got washed with my red sweatshirt are going to send me to hell? Is my kilt going to send me to hell? Well, I guess that'll be OK. At least there will be a lot of pretty, pants-wearing women in hell with me.
@NotMe
Newsflash: Jesus wore a dress!
<<< This one is old. From last month. At least there was one entry with the same theme. But still very fundy and stupid. >>>
Blue and pants are for "men," pink and dresses are for "women," but that leaves out a lot. What about green? Who gets to wear green? Or black? Are shirts for men? If women should wear blouses, where do you draw the line between "blouse" and "shirt?" And how does this square with Jesus's fashion choices?in his image??! If you wear clothes at all, you're insulting God!
Oh, who cares what clothes we wear anyway? If you like pink pants or green shorts, fine. Go ahead. As for me, I'll be wearing the tawny fur. Thank you.
AesmaelThe woman shall not wear that which pertaineth unto a man, neither shall a man put on a woman's garment: for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God.
Cute how the fundies hang onto the bits from Leviticus and Deuteronomy they like (that others do) and dismiss those bits they dislike (that they do).
listen you ignorant piece of shit... god, if he exists, doesnt care about clothes. let think back shall we? Jesus wore a robe, which in itself was a dress. and if you really want to get technical... man (and woman) were created Naked, are born naked, so i guess if we go by your understanding, i guess we should all be nudists really...
We-ell....
what are you, a woman or a man
Jesus is generally drawn as wearing robes. I think this is based on Israelite culture of the time, where all men wore robes. How, then, can this guy justify dictating what people can wear based on "defiance of God"? The new testament ends way before the most conservative modern clothes were invented, so presumably God doesn't really care what we wear, since He hasn't bothered to inspire someone to write a book of the Bible about it...
The real sad/funny thing is that pink was originally a masculine color (watered down red, red=blood=strength) and blue was a feminine color (blue=peace). So by Xenon's logic any women wearing pink are an abomination as are any men wearing blue. And who decides what makes somebody a "sicko" as I am much more worried about the man with a rifle who listens to the voices in his head than the man who decided to wear a kilt.
Most women today are transvestites
I'll concede Deut 22:5's existence. HOWEVER, every other thing in that chapter is part of the law. Why stick a moral rule (assuming this example is as such) in with about 30 ceremonial ones?
Ecccch! I look horrible in pink! I delight in dying pink things black. Or purple. Or green. Anything but pink! In my wardrobe, pink must either die or be dyed. I wonder what this person thinks of that song "Devil with the Blue Dress On." Oooo, confusion! It's a dress, but it's BLUE! And worn by a DEVIL! Oh, save the souls of the kiddies, it's music maskerading as Satanism, once more! Must be the influence of the Eeeeevil SATAN. Hee. I would pay to watch that head explode. Besides, my boobs kinda indicate my gender rather well. Lack of an adam's apple, tapered chin. Yep. Can't mistake me for a dude these days.
XenonII needs a lobotomy. There's just no other hope.
Just FYI, the "boys" and "girls" colors used to be reversed and pink was masculine. It's not about who wears what, it's about your perception of color and fashion. CUrrently (For ONCE in world history), skirts and dresses for men are not fashionable and "proper"... what does that say?
First of all, I agree that a man in a dress is a little odd, however, I would like to see you try to do anything in a dress, and after that, you can go ahead and try that statement again. My friend can't do anything in a dress, except maybe take it off, but you wouldn't know anything about that, would you?
Actually, pink was originally a very masculine color, and blue feminine. It's only recently that that's changed.
Most people dress babies according to gender because it's kind of hard to tell otherwise. Grown adults, on the other hand, tend to dress based on:
Personally, I've always chosen my clothes according to practicality and comfort, and as I've not found dresses to meet either criterion, I tend to wear pants.
But really, clothes are clothes, and it's stupid to try to class one cloth construct as feminine and another as masculine. If God existed, I would hope that he'd have better things to do than nitpick wardrobes.
women are particularly bad at violating this rule.
You want to know why so many women reject traditional female attire? Because the stuff men get to wear is actually practical, hard wearing and comfortable, whereas traditional female attire is restrictive, impractical, fragile, frequently really uncomfortable and sometimes even downright hazardous to the health. On occasion, it was actually the conscious intention of the designer for it to be restrictive and humbling.
It's only been in recent history that males wore blue and girls wore pink. Used to be the other way around. Girls wore blue, and boys wore pink. This is evidenced in antique christening gowns babies wore.
Men don't wear dresses, they do wear kilts. Women have worn trousers since the dawn of history. I would love to wear my tight jeans and waggle my ass at you.
Clothes has varied over time so much that there can be no absolute right or wrong about this. In Jesus' time all wore long kaftans or dresses, no trousers at all. During the 18th century all wore pastel colours. During most of recent history (ie the last 2000 years) small children were dressed in a unisex dresslike garment till they started to walk.
Men should not be clean shaven then, either.
What do you mean "we dress babies in the right colours"? I was dressed in brown, blue and orange when I was a baby girl, and my mom was a Sunday School teacher.
To some extent he/she is right, if men are transvestites when they wear dresses, then women are transvestites when they wear trousers. But as there is nothing wrong (or even particulary interesting) with being a transvestite, who cares?
There are more pressing matters to turn to; starvation, threat of nuclear wars, shortage of oil and clean water.
Newsflash, arehole: I'm wearing a purple shirt. I call it my manly shirt.
Actually, that was the amusing diversion. THIS is the newsflash: pink isn't girly. Tacky, but not girly. also, blue? Can be quite femenine (well, SEEN that way).
Whereas quite a few men's dress shirts are pinkish (I hear the screams of a thousand terrfied fashion-...people).
So... yeah.
I don't like pink that much (anymore). I much prefer blue.
Anyway, the whole pink is for girls and blue is for boys thing isn't that old I don't think. It's certainly not biblical.
And I bought all my jeans in the women's clothing section, which means they are clothing meant for women.
So, the only available colors are blue and pink? I like green, myself, my husband likes yellow and we both like red.
What about kilts? There's certainly nothing feminine with a Scotsman in a kilt with all the "accessories".
I believe there was a study that showed baby boys actually preffered pink and girls blue but its a social thing.
The greeks , chinese and japanese might disagree on the dress thing, if you count a robe as a dress.
Can a woman be a transvestite ? OK, looked it up and I will give you that. Many women wear pants because its much easier to plant rice on a windy day without your skirt dragging in the mud or blowing up and flashing your butt to the world.
where does God command no pants for women ?
I hear Satan prefers bikinies with leather miniskirts and red leather corsets, then again maybe it was just that club.
There's both mens pants and women's pants, dipshit. The pants do not fit the opposite gender correctly, so no, women in pants are not transvestites.
Oh, and just to throw this out there...
You're a dick.
That is all.
So what'll I do with that blue dress and the stretchy, tight, form-fitting, barely legal, provocative, pink pants?
Sorry, loony, in my culture men wear the kilts, in any brilliant tartan they choose.
So the blue shirt and the leggings I’m wearing right now will send me to hell. Good, I’d rather be there than with people like you if you’re going to heaven. Pink was originally for guys and blue was originally for girls (in many old Disney films many female characters wore blue), so do your research, dumbass.
This wasn't Davey Stewart?
And i have a pink Hawaiian shirt i wear to support coworkers who have breast cancer.
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
