Went on a date with some chick from work. Was really excited to see her. Had been thinking bout her nightly before bed. We talked for weeks on social media and ste up a date. We went to an applebees and she was like a 6.5 at most. Tight, athletic in all the right places.
She was acting really distant from me, and obviously did not want to get physical with me on the date so I did not even try. After we were done I asked to go to her place but she did not want to go.
Had been planning on playing video games at her house and then maybe having consensual, missionary PIV intercouse.
When I asked what happened, she said I it was the worst date she ever went on and my clothes were dirty and smelled. It is not my fault she dressed like a slut and put on MAKEUP to go to applebees.
Alas, this is the closest I ever got to a live female that was not in my family
11 comments
So let me get this straight: you refused to even groom and clean yourself on a first date with a girl you admit is not bad looking, expected to get laid then and there, and then proceed to blame her for being “slutty” for actually taking her date with you seriously?
SIGH Incels really are an utterly hopeless cause, aren’t they?
I think your expectations were too high for a first date. I definitely wouldn't invite someone back to my place after a first date (because of personal safety), much less have sex with them.
The but about her makeup and clothes making her a slut was uncalled for. Most people want to look nice on dates, to give a good impression to the potential boy/girlfriend.
He’s excited about seeing her, thinking about her nightly, describes her as “tight, athletic in all the right places”…how does that add up to a “6.5 at most”? Or is that just “sour grapes?” Like, he’s now saying, after the fact, since he didn’t score, “well, she really wasn’t THAT hot…”
Your entire post can be encapsulated in the part where you flatly admit "I did not even try" but not in the context you want anyone to believe.
You didn't think it was worth the kind of grooming normal people do even when they're not on a date but expected her to get naked later. Like somehow putting on a clean shirt is more ceremony and hassle and a personal imposition than sex. And her being completely turned off and distant throughout dinner where you yourself acknowledged a complete lack of chemistry or affection did nothing to diminish this already unrealistic expectation. And as always it was the absence of sex and observation of dating etiquette as though she were treating this like a serious date with someone she was seriously considering starting a relationship that made her a slut while your "plans" to just casually have sex after a really lousy dinner you obviously didn't treat like anything more significant than a late-night snack run to a convenience store like sex is simply equivalent to idle conversation don't reflect badly on you.
Okay, read that back to me. Sound retarded without your personal sense of victimhood? That's because it is exactly as retarded as it sounds. Your completely twisted sense of propriety between the significance of being expected to maintain your personal hygiene particularly in public versus your belief in how little a deal it should be for another person to agree to have sex with you (despite just how much significance is placed on sex in every other regard) bears an especial need for review. I mean it's good for a laugh for me in small doses from this distance but anyone who has to deal with you personally is going be about as miserable in all their interactions with you as you take all this effort making yourself in all your interactions with the world.
maybe having consensual , missionary PIV intercouse. Rather telling that he considers this noteworthy...
Maybe wear clean clothes, bathe, and try some basic grooming before going on a date?
(Of course, she's a "slut" for NOT wanting to sleep with him right away... ugh, incels never mature past age 14, apparently.)
@NonProphet
They've heard all that a million times. When a nice shirt doesn't guarantee sex every time they put it on they conclude it's bullshit, completely incapable of understanding that it's the subtext (in this case effort and respect) that matters and following through with pleasant company that isn't a transparent act intended to obligate repayment and not the shirt itself. And if there were a magic shirt that had that kind of power they'd just wear it into a greasy threadbare rag and still be left angrily shrieking their confusion that easy sex doesn't equate to a long-term relationship.
@Bastethotep
Now that I've had another look at this there's another little detail that's wide open for disturbing implications.
Alas, this is the closest I ever got to a live female that was not in my family
Come to think of it, with incels even mentioning family can send up red flags...
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.