ScottieMcDowell #pratt

ScottieMcDowell #pratt youtube.com

(Tl;dr the OP is comparing having a horse as a loyal companion to owning a well-treated slave. Their wording almost makes them seem like a Slavery apologist.)

Horses 🏇🏻Are No Different From Slaved Pokemons.

Only Unlike Fictional Pokémon ,

Horses Are Actually Real.

And The Horse Is Also A Slave.

And Yet The Horse Is Widely Known To The World For Being So Loyal To His Rider That It Was Sometimes Known That Horses Would Keep On Running For There Rider Masters Until They Died Of Exhaustion.

And Even After All Of The Years Of This….

The Horse Does Not Seem To Mind Or Even Care.

Because That One Person Is Correct.

Sometimes A Slave Can Still Be A Slave And It Not Meaning That You Have To Be Nasty And Beat Your Slave Mercilessly.

Sometimes It Can Mean A Relationship Between A Slave,
And A Kind Master.

Just Like A Horse And It’s Rider.

13 comments

Unlike a horse, a human slave is sapient.

A horse is more intelligent than that which can’t spell ‘Their’, and capitalises every word.

Therefore what makes you think you have the right to have your opinions listened to, Shitty McDonotverywell…?!

@Anon-e-moose #242522

and capitalises every word.

Trying to read stuff like that gives me a genuine headache. I HATE it when people type like that…

“Horses 🏇🏻Are No Different From Slaved Pokemons.”
Except horse evolution is different, horse variation is greater, and no one, to my knowledge, serves Pokemon meat…

“Only Unlike Fictional Pokémon, Horses Are Actually Real. And The Horse Is Also A Slave.”
You need to work on making your points. Pokemon are slaves and fictional, horses are different because they’re slaves and real?
‘Kay. I’d use the term ‘domesticated,’ for both, but that’s me.

“And Yet The Horse Is Widely Known To The World”
They’re domesticated. And they’re pretty dumb.

“And Even After All Of The Years Of This….The Horse Does Not Seem To Mind Or Even Care.”
All the years of… Um… Is it your understanding that horses have this history available to them? That horses in the fort know if a courier rides off on Nobbin, and only the courier comes back, that Nobbin is dead? I don’t think they’re that sophisticated. Slaves, on the other hand, if they see the good looking galley slaves go to the Master’s Bedroom, and never come back, they’re probably not living in South Beach.

“Because That One Person Is Correct.”
Dude, everyone knows that horses are loyal. We bred them to be loyal. That’s part of the design, the plan. Dogs, horses, camels.

“Sometimes A Slave Can Still Be A Slave And It Not Meaning That You Have To Be Nasty And Beat Your Slave Mercilessly.”
‘Slave’ is about their status, not your treatment. However, there’s usually nothing that STOPS a slaver from being nasty.

“Sometimes It Can Mean A Relationship Between A Slave,
And A Kind Master.”
1st of all, CAN BE. It’s the master who decides how mean to be, and the slave can do nothing about it.
2nd, how do you decide to be KINDA nice, though? Nice enough not to beat them, disciplined enough to get some work out of them, but nasty enough not to free them?

“Just Like A Horse And It’s Rider.”
The only thing keeping a master from riding a horse to its death is the master’s need. Not the horse’s life.

The only thing from this I understood was the word “horse”.
And to that, I say “NEIGH!”…

There's a reason no one tries to saddle zebras, (at least not more than once.) Horses are a lot more domesticateable than their cousins.

If you're hinting that slaves should have been as selflessly loyal as horses, go boil your head.

@Sasha #242538

Pretty sure he’s saying that biblical slavery is no worse than owning a couple of horses.

Just FYI, the OP doubled down on their inanity:

There Is Nothing Wrong With Having A Horse As A Slave. Or As Pets.🏇🏻

They GENUINELY do NOT undestand the difference between a “pet” and a “slave”…

Is he a tone-deaf PETA mmber ot a bona-fide apologist for slavery?

I was tempted to say that at least “humans are like horses” is a step up from “humans are like lobsters” but I’m pretty sure Jordan Peterson isn’t pro-slavery.

Sometimes A Slave Can Still Be A Slave And It Not Meaning That You Have To Be Nasty And Beat Your Slave Mercilessly.
Sometimes It Can Mean A Relationship Between A Slave,
And A Kind Master.

Well, I think anyone who knows anything at all about the history of slavery should know that not all masters were “kind.” And of course a “kind” slave master is still ya know….a slave master! Something that IMO it’s only to call yourself if it’s in BDSM context! lol

Interested in being the horse-human of a dominatrix?

ScottieMcDowell #pratt youtube.com

13 comments

Confused?