Point Refuted A Thousand Times

Show post

church mouse guy #pratt #dunning-kruger baptistboard.com

Biological evolution has been proven to be mathematically/scientifically impossible. I have linked the May article in my signature. Put simply there are 20 amino acids that make up DNA and the average strand of DNA has 250 molecules of amino acids arranged in an exact manner. So the math is 20 x 20 x 20 x 20, etc. till there are 250 such multiplications, or 20 to the 250th power, Calculate that for all the types of DNA in the world and you can quickly see that it just can't be done. Mutations in DNA mean loss of information and can lead to early death. The fossil record clearly shows that all life forms were present in the Cambrian layer. Darwin just is scientifically impossible.

Show post

Ghost #wingnut #conspiracy #pratt ghost.report

Bernie Sanders Is Pro-Rape? Where’s the #MeToo Outrage?


While Bernie Sanders continues to tout his Socialist pipe-dream, his followers seem to not know or not care about Bernie Sanders’s views on rape. Ever since the #MeToo movement, the acceptable boundaries of flirting and sexual harassment has become smaller and smaller. Although allegations of decades old sexual abuse claims have brought down many powerful people in the #MeToo era, it seems Bernie Sanders is immune to the same level of scrutiny.

In 1972, Bernie Sanders wrote a filthy rape fantasy piece for now defunct “The Vermont Freeman.” For those Bernie-Bros who are quick to dismiss the previous, not even Left-leaning Snopes could deny Bernie’s rape fantasy stories. In Bernie’s sick rape story, he writes:

“A woman enjoys intercourse with her man — as she fantasizes being raped by 3 men simultaneously”

In another part of the article, he gets even more disturbing by making pedophile-like statement:

“Do you know why the newspapers with articles like ‘Girl, 12, raped by 14 men’ sell so well? To what in us are they appealing?”

Unfortunately, this perverted article was dismissed by Bernie Sanders staff in 2015 as, “dumb attempt at dark satire in an alternative publication intended to attack gender stereotypes in the 1970s” that in “no way reflects his views or record on women.”

Ironically, the same Bernie Sanders “staff” who attempted to justify their boss’s rape stories, were later accused of sexual harassment a year later in 2016. The allegations were so serious that Bernie had to give a public apology for his staff’s sexual abusive conduct (3 years later in 2019).


Is it a mere coincidence that Bernie Sanders openly wrote rape stories, only to have his political staff conduct themselves in sexual abuse a year later? If the Left weren’t such disgusting hypocrites, they would have shunned Sanders in 2015 and saved the sexual abuse victims from being victimized by his staff in 2016. Moreover, now that Sanders is running for President in 2020, one can only assume that this kind of sexual abuse continues in his campaign since no real repercussions seems to happen to Bernie Sanders when it comes to rape and/or sexual abuse allegations.

I call on all Leftists to live up to your #MeToo standards and call on Bernie Sanders to drop out of the 2020 Presidential race; force Bernie to personally acknowledge his role in the promotion of rape and sexual abuse within his campaign operation. By the Left staying silent on Bernie Sanders, it only shows that Democrats don’t give a damn about #MeToo, sexual abuse or womens’ safety in general. It seems as if the only time Democrats care about sexual abuse allegations is when they can be politically exploited, which underscores their lack of true empathy of victimization.

If you are for Bernie Sanders, then you are pro-rape and sexual abuse; period!


P.S. Bernie Sanders is such a hypocritical liar, he refuses to pay his staff the $15 an hour wage he touts on the campaign trail as the “should-be” minimum wage for America; what POS!

Show post

David J. Stewart #fundie #pratt jesus-is-savior.com

How do we show our appreciation to God for our freedoms? We teach our children that they originated from stardust, formed into slime and then somehow evolved from primitive mindless creatures into intelligent human beings. Only a complete idiot would even try to legitimize such nonsense. Only a mentally-ill person could believe that there's any truth to the bogus claims of evolutionists, especially considering that there's not even one credible shred of evidence to support it. The Bible makes more sense than any secular explanation for the origin of the universe... “In the beginning God” (Genesis 1:1a).

Show post

Reynolds #pratt #fundie baptistboard.com

Darwin didn't really jump the gun. He proposed a theory. He himself readily admitted his theory was based on a simple cell and that his theory would be false if the cell were proven to be complex.
His theory was in fact based more in socialism, his extreme racist version of it, than science.

Show post

Josh Bernstein #conspiracy #pratt rightwingwatch.org

During his appearance on Bill Deagle’s radio program yesterday, radical right-wing commentator Josh Bernstein called on President Trump to order the military to arrest the heads of social media companies for supposedly censoring conservative voices on their platforms and warned that failing to do so will result in “millions of Americans” rising up to address the issue “by any means possible.”

“What President Trump needs to do is he needs to arrest the heads of Google, Twitter, and Facebook and shut down Silicon Valley,” Bernstein declared. “I would go in with the federal government and shut it down because what they are doing is illegal. They are usurping the First Amendment’s freedom of speech. They must be shut down. And if not, we need to figure out a way to get them gone.”

“The federal government needs to get involved and if they have to send the military in and drag these MFers out by their hair, that’s what needs to happen,” he added. “They are not going to sit here and destroy the freedom of speech in America and our Constitution that we have fought for and bled for and died for for hundreds of years. We are not going to let it happen. And I will tell you right now, if they continue to do this, they are going to have a major problem, not just from people like me but millions of Americans that are not going to put up with this. Let me tell you, we will take care of this by any means possible.”

Show post

Angerfist #fundie #pratt disqus.com

"Now, that some sects of Christianity have issues with the LGBT crowd is not a surprise. But to be deliberately dishonest and suggest that they have embraced pedophiles is utterly revolting, completely despicable."

I find it odd that people who advocate for no objective morals regarding sex act the complete opposite when it comes to pedophelia. The same people who say we should not judge others based on sexual predisposition turn and judge those with sexual predispositions. The same people who say we should not impose sexual morals on others turn and impose objective sexual morals on others. The same people who say we should not be so bigoted turn and act like bigots.

What is completely missed by liberals, the moment you embraced subjective morality and embraced sexual perversions with homosexuality, you paved a wide road for pedophelia.

Its a logical conclusion, not a hate filled one.

The only way to oppose pedophilia is by asserting sexuality has a certain purpose being desire and should be guided by certain objective morals.

Show post

cadcoke5 #pratt #fundie disqus.com

"And if they're wrong, they're not wrong to the tune of 4 billion years plus." Actual tests show that these dating methods can be off by similar magnitudes.

Actually, the radiometric dating process shows a lot of inconsistencies. For example, if the entire earth were a giant diamond consisting of only Carbon 14, all of it would have decayed in the age that secularists assign to diamonds. Yet, it is there. True the C14 gives an "age" of 55,000, if we assume the current rate of C14 accumulation. Less radiation would inflate the age. So, unless we can calibrate theC14 formation rate, we can't really take these "ages" as valid. But, at the very least, it invalidates the billions of years normally assigned to diamonds.

Soft tissue has a comparable half-life type of decay rate. So, for the evolutionists, it is foolish to expect a dinosaur fossil to have soft tissue, yet it is there.

Since lava is supposed to start at 0 years, when it solidifies, we can compare known dates of lava formations, to what its radiometric dates give. But, when we do so, for lava that was known to erupt in less than 40 ago, we can get results over 3 million years, using the Potassium-argon method normally used for supposedly old samples. But, if the rock were to contain something that evolutionists expect to be from 3+ million years ago, it is assumed to be correct. There are various proposed solutions offered for the wrong dates for modern lava, but why are presumed older rocks immune from the same problems? Why should a method that tests wrong when we can verify it, be assumed to be right when we cannot verity it?

Show post

Robycop3 #pratt baptistboard.com

I have a simple question for evolutionists - If the amoeba, the simplest animal, evolved into the paramecium, a more-complex animal, which evolved into the volvox, a multi-celled animal, til finally animal life evolved into us, then, WHY ARE THERE STILL AMOEBAE???????????? Shouldn't they all have become paramecia by now ?

Show post

Wilsonword #moonbat #pratt dailykos.com

An estimated 94 to 100 million souls lost their lives, killed by Communist regimes. The U.S.S.R. gets much focus but Communist genocides in Asia wiped out millions also. Economic and political systems are intertwined so deeply. It is too simplistic to say Communism did not really fail because it was never truly implemented as it was originally meant to be.

The two points you make are not logically connected.

a. milions died in those so called communism regimes.

b. its too simplistic to say communism did not really fail because it was never truly implemented.

You dont make any kind of connection between those two. How does A mean B is true? We could far more convincingly say the opposite: that A happened BECAUSE of B. Millions died because it was not real communism, since real communism does not have the violent coercion and murder of millions of people on the whim of one absolute ruler as an central aim or method.

ANY system that has ‘the violent coercion and murder of millions of people on the whim of one absolute ruler’ is not communism. It loses its right to call itself communism right away on just that one aspect. Since a key and unalterable aim of communism is “…the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all" - Communist Manifesto, Section 2 (Marx and Engels)

Yes, quite the opposite of what we are normally told, the basic aim of communism is: FREEDOM. So, Stalin and Mao etc were state dictators, not communists. Because they deliberately suppressed the freedom of their own people, directly against basic communist principles. It seems pretty clear…

(though, actually, we cant leave it just at that - there are various things that need be taken into account when we consider what actually happened in Russia and China then).

Show post

Susan Jane Elohim #fundie #pratt christiannews.net

I just sent this Council woman a card at her official address. Telling her she is on the news for affirming/swearing on a work of fiction and should read the whole Bible because she does not understand the significance of what she did.
Pray that she reads the bible.

Show post

David J. Stewart #fundie #pratt jesusisprecious.org

The popular claim is that the U.S. government is BY the people, FOR the people, and OF the people; but you're a deceived fool if you really believe that false claim. When the government ousted the inspired Holy Bible in 1963 from America's schools, they didn't ask the American people what they wanted. Some demonic Masonic judges (4 of 6) made that fateful decision for all of us! Their lame excuse was that allowing the Word of God tramples upon and violates the rights of atheists and non-religious children. But consider that those same evil judges permit the propaganda of Evolution—an insane clown circus of liars, frauds and deceivers! There is not one legitimate PROOF of Evolution! If men evolved from apes, then why are there still apes? If giraffes grew long necks (as evolutionists claim) by trying to extend their necks over millions of years to reach the leaves (food) in the trees, then what did giraffes eat for those millions of years? And if they ate food closer to the ground, why would they be trying so hard to reach the food in the trees, that they'd actually stretch their neck over millions of years? Folks, are you stupid enough to believe the absurd claims of evolutionists? What saith the Scripture? 2nd Peter 3:5-6, “For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished.” The Holy Bible is very direct, telling us that evolutionists are WILLINGLY IGNORANT of the truth that the world was created by the Word of God!!! My friend, the Bible makes perfect sense to me, but Evolution is obvious blatant fraud.

Show post

Incel Wiki #sexist #pratt incels.wiki

Dating is an RPG videogame where you need to pass a minimum looks threshold to pass levels. If the player does not meet the minimum looks treshold, he can still pass levels by compensating via money and status. In recent times, the games' difficulty levels have been increased, primarily in the West.
Part 1: At a bar, a man and a woman are smiling at each other. The woman’s eyes are photoshopped to glow red and emit a cone of light scanning the man’s face.
Part 2: A sinister red science-fiction computer display, showing the man’s head frontal and in profile. In the buttom-right corner, a purple female symbol with a fist inside the circle.







Show post

church mouse guy #pratt #fundie baptistboard.com

That's not talking about evolution. It means firstly that dogs have puppies and cats have kittens. It also means secondly that horse is a kind and specific breeds of horses are still horses. It was recently ruled that an Australian dingo is not a dog, because the creature cannot be domesticated although genetically it may belong to the dog family.

Show post

church mouse guy #pratt #fundie baptistboard.com

It is the American left that clearly does not want free speech. They think that free speech obstructs their agenda of a leftist dictatorship and they think that free speech is not a God-given right. The Masters of the Universe have sided with the American left. Also, the American left has sided with jihadi psychopaths in an alliance to obtain power by violence. What the American left does not understand at all is that the jihadi psychopaths will turn on them once Christians, Jews, and capitalists have all been silenced in the USA. The reason that jihadi psychopaths will turn on the American left is that Muhammad said to slay everyone who was not a member of Islam.

So meanwhile the American left is busy silencing the opponents of socialism/communism and the opponents of homosexuality and the opponents of jihadi psychopaths. It does not matter that you are a refugee from communist brutality or that you teach Christian morality or that you are just teaching what jihadi psychopaths say in Arabic in some Indianapolis mosque.

I believe that the American left and their violent jihadi psychopaths will win power in America. As I said before, I then think that the jihadi psychopaths will take power away from the American left by using the lack of free speech that the American left is now instituting. The jihadi psychopaths will say that the American left is slandering the prophet Muhammad. As President Obama said at the UN on September 25, 2012, The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.

Katherine Timpf wrote in National Review yesterday that 41 percent of American university students believe that hate speech such as defined as speaking against the leftist agenda should be punished. Here are a couple of paragraphs from what she said:

What’s always been the most interesting to me is that it seems as though most of the people who want to crack down on people’s First Amendment right to free speech are also people who are very liberal, the same kinds of people who often claim that President Donald Trump is a Nazi. In other words: They want the government to have the power to control speech, they think that the head of the government is a literal Nazi, and yet they don’t see any irony in that. It truly blows my mind.

Everyone isn’t always going to like every person in a position of power in this country, and that’s exactly why we need to keep our speech completely free. If we don’t do that, then our right to speak our minds is subject to the whims of whoever happens to be in power at that time — and that person might have a different view on what kind of speech is or is not acceptable. It could get very scary: If a leader, for example, decided that he or she considered any speech criticizing him or her to be “hate speech,” then we could even lose our right to place a check on government power using our First Amendment right to be critical in that way.

So what are we to do about hateful speech? We speak out against it. That’s right: The way to stop others from saying hateful things is not to use government power to silence them, but rather to use our own freedoms to combat what they say. After all, the only way to ensure that the government doesn’t have the power to police what we say is to make sure that we never give it that power in the first place — because the same laws that could be used to stop speech you don’t like could also at some point be used to silence you.

The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam. --Barack Hussein Obama

Show post

Gary DeMar #fundie #pratt

Charles Darwin could never have conceived of the Joker character as he is depicted and played in The Dark Knight. Darwinism flowered in the midst of a world impacted imperfectly by a tide of Christian influence. No one was talking about being an “intellectually fulfilled atheist.” No one was claiming that morals are social constructs. The Joker as portrayed by Ledger is the consistent Darwinist. To use his own words, “I’m just ahead of the curve.” There is nothing menacing about the Joker if evolution is true. If you go to see the film, ask yourself this question: “If the assumptions of the four horsemen of atheism are true, what did the Joker do that was wrong?” To be ahead of the curve simply means that he figured out and is willing to live out what he is by nature. Darwin drew the blueprints for the Joker thinking he was making Pygmalion.

Show post

Robert316 #fundie#pratt livescience.com

You who belive in Darwin can you prove we came from apes? What proff do you have? Can a tornado after picking up debliss spit out a brand new car? No it cannot. Nethier does anything in life coincidentally happen. We and nature where all created. He fringer prints are everywhere. Evolution is a lie and it cannot be proven that we came from apes. It takes more faith to belive in evolution than it does in a Creator. Open up your minds. God created science, not man.