baby_killer.exe has stopped working
image

(DiamondConfident1811)
Intelligent pro-choicer: “A person is defined by the ability to kill a fetus, a fetus does not have the ability to kill a fetus therefore it is not a person”.

(Altered_Beast805)
Abortionist: "A person is defined by their ability to commit atrocities".

Me: "That's just projection".

(Mr_Laszlo_Panaflex)
"A fetus doesn't exist because its not conscious."

-Actual argument someone threw at me today.

(No_Rip_1299)
Neither is a person in a coma…

(HaloNoble)
They have to be joking, like seriously, THEY HAVE TO JOKING, SOMEONE CAN'T BE THAT DELUSIONAL, RIGHT?

(i_sont_)
I got something better. "You are killing potential woman with abortion because of inconvenience, that seems rather misogynistic dont you think?"

(DiamondConfident1811)
The fetus could also be a transgender. So it’s also really transphobic 🐸

(i_sont_)
It could also be gay, so it is also really homophobic 🦁

(ilikeinterrobangs)
Babies are all the different races, it's pretty racist to kill them if you ask me

(TexasDude29)
Nope. They are never flustered. They have a definition at the ready and will die clinging to it

(Effective-Honey-2360)
There's no way to define it without digging yourself a hole.

(TexasDude29)
Apparently not to them. They most commonly say "sentience" or "brain activity." The trouble is that makes a degree of sense

(Effective-Honey-2360)
What you reply with is examples of people with limited brain activity/sentience eg someone in a coma. You wouldn't just kill them, especially if you knew that they would wake up in a few months.

(TexasDude29)
I do all the time. Either it's brushed off or pointed out that we unplug such people all the time

(Effective-Honey-2360)
At a certain point you may find that the person you are talking to is literally pro-murder. Not much to say after that point I admit.