After gender, transgender ideology’s most important concept is that of gender identity, which it defines as a person’s deep, inner sense of their gender, meaning their deep, inner sense of their sex.
Um… yes and no and sort of. It’s complicated, and varies for each trans or non-binary person. People experience gender identity in many different ways, and not all of it relates to the body (sex).
Also… which transgender ideology? Trans people have rather varied views about gender.
A transgender person’s “gender identity” is not, however, their identity but a contradiction of it.
…Huh?
A man who calls himself a woman still has the identity of a man because he is still a man.
That’s not what ‘identity’ is or how it works! That’s not how any of this works!
Thus the term “gender identity” refers neither to a gender nor to an identity; it refers to a person’s idea of what sex they are.
…which is often a major part of their personal identity, when true.
It seems like you’re juggling a lot of semantics here to ‘debunk’ a term by saying largely the same thing so-called “gender ideologues” are. In other words, you’re just being overly pedantic.
Thus when we hear that someone is “questioning their gender identity”, this is only someone who is wondering whether they are male or female.
…wondering in terms of gender identity, not natal bio-sex. Because honey, I’m perfectly aware that I have male bits down there, and many bodily features normally associated with people who are male. I haven’t had any dilemmas about that.
I am trying to change my body in a more female direction, yes, but that’s an ongoing deliberate effort. I’m not “wondering” about anything in regards to my biological features.
As Helen Joyce points out,
Never a good recommendation for whatever comes after those words…
But is it true to say that we all have a deep, inner sense of our sex? I suspect that most people no more have such a thing than they have a deep, inner sense of how many arms they have. For most people, their sex is such an obvious and familiar part of them that they never think about it, still less do they see it as the sort of thing about which they might have opinions.
You’re so close to getting it, yet so far.
Here’s a thought: try losing an arm… or your penis. Would you be upset?
Have you ever heard of phantom limb sensations?
What you said is precisely why many people take their sex for granted and don’t think in terms of gender identity: “their sex is such an obvious and familiar part of them that they never think about it”. Not just that, but they’re also comfortable enough with it.
That doesn’t mean they’re comfortable with society’s expectations forced upon their bodies; but bar those impositions, they’re actually okay with their sexed bodily attributes as such.
Dysphoric transfolk, on the other hand, are not. We feel the wrongness regardless of wider society; indeed, we feel it even when we’re completely alone. We’re not transitioning merely so others will find us more attractive; first and foremost, we do it for ourselves, because we need it.
If this is correct, the only people who have “gender identities” are transgenders, whose deep, inner sense of their sex deceives them.
No, we are simply particularly aware of them since we have a mismatch between gender identity and our bodily sex (pre-transition). When something doesn’t fit, it becomes a problem and you get increasingly aware of it.
Think of it in terms of a shoe that doesn’t fit. The shape is wrong, the size too small, it constricts your foot in places and it gives you blisters.
Then along come all these other people in comfortable shoes, let’s call them “Helen Joyce”, who tell you that no, the shoe actually fits, it was made for you, even!
It’s not that you should get a new shoe; no, you should just accept that the shoe is right for you, and learn to be comfortable in this painful, cramped, hard-edged shoe. Your pain isn’t real, and even if it is, get over it! It’s a good fit for others, so why not for you?