A Brilliant Defense of White Nationalism

If Elie Mystal didn’t exist, we’d invent him. I wonder if we did. Much of American Renaissance’s work is showing progressive hypocrisy on race. In appearance, elocution, and legal reasoning, he’s the perfect straw man. Cable news takes him seriously. He can’t stop himself from blurting out what he really thinks about the Constitution, whites, and the so-called rule of law. His crude approach is refreshing. He clears away the hypocrisy that keeps the failed American experiment stumbling along.

Many whites believe our individualist, universalistic, analytic worldview is shared by other peoples. It’s not. Racial identity is not important to many whites, but it’s fundamental to people of other races. Many whites believe in colorblindness and the promise of an American civic identity.

American conservatives — mostly white — watch in disbelief as mobs topple heroes and radicals rewrite history. Yet they refuse to embrace white identity and say America was always for everyone. Most non-whites and progressives don’t buy it.

I endorse Elie Mystal’s book. To wake whites up, we need foolish leftists. He gives white conservatives no comforting illusions. Let National Review try to find common ground with the assertion the Constitution is “actually trash” written by “actual monsters who were trying to protect their rights to rape the humans they held in bondage.”

He argues that he can’t be “dispassionate” because a Supreme Court decision “directly affects the likelihood of me getting shot to death by the police while driving to the store.” Whites must concede their rights and sovereignty because Mr. Mystal is deluded. I’m sure he does not know that 10 percent of all whites and Hispanics who die from homicide are killed by a police officer compared to just 3 percent of black homicide victims.