> A child raised in a hypothetical situation in which they had never encountered a member of the opposite s ex would not grow up imitating the opposite s ex and wanting to add on, or remove, features to resemble something they had never seen.
This guy is holding sex = gender which is surprisingly since he got so close here. He just didn’t flip the argument to see that a child raised only with a single gender would probably submit to that gender regardless of biological sex to see that it’s a social construct.
To be fair, I never believed the “I was born that way” argument either and I’m a very binary trans person myself.