Yes, satan has a penis, but I'm not sure what that has to do with this thread?

Isn't that what heaven is supposedly like? Where everything is perfect and no one can come to harm?

Sure, but keep in mind this question: who is in Heaven?

Answer: the very few people who during their time on earth chose to believe in and obey God (this point is especially what almost no one does) and accept Jesus' payment of their sin debt. That all sounds very simple, but almost no one actually does it.

In other words, the population of Heaven is what we could call in human terms "a biased sample." Only the cream of the crop of the human population gets in, and they got in because they chose to live godly lives.

Now, compare that to the unbiased sample that comprises 99.999999999+% of the humans on the earth who are ungodly. They either proactively hate God, or are indifferent to God. In either case, they fail to obey God, and they commit acts of evil constantly. Those type of people never get into Heaven. And them not being allowed in is one of the main reasons why Heaven is able to be perfect.

"Science creates fictions to explain facts" - Gilman

Although hitler used darwinist principles to the 'T', I personally have never used any hitler arguments against darwinism solely because it undermines the fact that darwinists are perpetuating their own holocaust right now, and have been for decades, and their holocaust is even worse than hitler's. That holocaust is called 'abortion'. By using the hitler argument, IMO it makes it seem like we only need to worry about the other nefarious things darwinism will lead to and giving the impression that 'everything is fine and dandy right now regarding darwinism'; whilst ignoring darwinists' current crimes against humanity.

So for those reasons, I agree that there are better arguments to be made than the hitler argument. Such as that darwinism leads to the barbaric butchering of babies, right now.

Well, how about my theory as to why: feminism has rotted atheist/darwinist brains, so therefore, they believe that God must be a she-god or eunuch god, because to a brain rotted by feminism, she-gods and eunuch gods are "normal" and "not funny at all,"... but a Male God who is a Father, King, and who has a Penis is "not normal" and "the most hilarious thing ever!"

By the way, I wonder if when atheists pray to their eunuch god, they ever ask him: "how did you get cut?"

Even if God's Penis is "funny," it's nowhere near as funny as is the atheists' penis-less eunuch god!

The Apocalypse of these boards is nigh. I won't be able to warn you to repent later. Best to repent now.

"Elliot Rodger, Christian"

No he wasn't. He committed Onanism and he also wanted to fornicate. Those are not Christian traits.

I haven't heard of most of the people on your list, but the fact that you lie about that guy being a Christian is enough to prove your whole list is bull.

And even if your whole list was true, that would still be a drop in the bucket compared to the ~2 billion+ that your kind has murdered and continues to murder in the 'abortion' holocaust.

"Why is God male?"

Because He is. That's like saying "why am I female?" or "why is my mother female?" or "why is my father male?"

"Does he have male genitalia?"

Of course He does.

"It seems silly for the creator of the universe to have a wang and yet not have a female"

That's because you are thinking of God in dirty, worldly, fleshy terms. God's Member does not conform to those debased forms of thought.

Don't forget that many blacks often murder their own children via 'abortion.' But you won't see any of the racist clowns from "Black Lives Matter" ever talk about that, because they obviously don't really care about black lives.

[on "Law & Order: Criminal Intent")

Some years ago I watched a few episodes of this show and then they aired an episode that was nothing more than sickening pro-abortion propaganda. After that disgusting piece of crap, I stopped watching this show.

The other day I was flicking through the channels and I thought I happened upon a made-for-TV mafia movie or something. I like mafia movies so I figured: "Ok, let's see what this is." Then I found out it was this show.

I was shocked though when after the credits instead of seeing Vincent D'Onofrio with dashing young moviestar-like good looks, I saw what looked to be a totally different person entirely. Vincent D'Onofrio has become an ugly, fat old slob!

Likewise, Kathryn Erbe now looks like a haggard witch.

My theory as to why these actors' looks both got totally shot to Hell is that it is the sin of them making pro-abortion propaganda catching up with them and manifesting itself physically in their now-hideous looks.

[The actress Melissa (Joan Hart), who makes no secret of her strong commitment to Christianity]

That's pretty odd coming from a woman who willingly agreed to pose in sexually provocative ways for Maxim magazine, knowing full-well that the idea behind doing that was to encourage its male readers to indulge in Onanism to images of her.

That's not something a woman with a "strong commitment to Christianity" would do.

darwinists think playing dungeons and dragons is cool. In fact, they often plagiarize dungeons and dragons by stating that there are multiple universes and this is just one of billions of universes, therefore that is how darwinism can be true.

Yes, although it's just nonsense fantasy in dungeons and dragons, darwinists have taken that and turned it into a crackpot idea that they actually, truly believe is part of real-life.

I can't even begin to tell you how many dozens of times I've seen darwinists advocating that crackpot, dungeons and dragons plagiarized idea on the Expelled board.

Just goes to show once again that darwinists are batty.

Darwinists will always be on a never-ending wild goose chase - with no proof whatsoever for any of their outlandish claims - because they are trying to fit the reality of what happened at the dawn of time in our Universe into a box that it cannot ever fit into.

Since the Universe and life in it were not, in reality, created by natural processes, it will never be possible to legitimately explain either the origin or diversity of life, or the Universe, using natural processes. There will never be any testable, repeatable, or observable evidence for the outlandish claims of Darwinism/evolution, because that reality has never actually existed, other than in the hearts and minds of Darwinists.

Darwinists are puzzled about why they haven't truly won and never will. They don't understand why the controversy remains despite them having insidiously infested every area of educational institutions and media; having a veritable monopoly to become propagandists and promote their opinions as 'facts' to everyone with inescapable, relentless bombardments of it at every turn. What is stated in the above paragraphs is the reason their endless Darwinist propaganda ultimately fails on enlightened persons, (although sadly, it does 'succeed' in socially engineering many to believe in Darwinism/evolution ) several decades after Darwinists though they had won. It is the reason why Darwinists can never truly win, and achieve a 100% belief rate/hivemind; which they wish and strive for.

Bottomline: You CANNOT legitimately - or with any proof - explain the origin or diversity of life & the Universe with natural processes since natural processes were not used to create it. So just stop trying.

The fear of the LORD is the beginning of knowledge,But fools despise wisdom and instruction.

How is America a completely evil cesspool?

For one thing, it willingly participates in committing the most egregious atrocity/crime against humanity that has ever existed in the history of mankind, by legally murdering hundreds of thousands of babies per year. It glosses over those murders with false label euphemisms designed to pretend as if they are not murders, like "abortion," "women's rights," "right to choose," etc...but just like a rose by any other name is still a rose, legalized mass murders by any other name are still legalized mass murders. Nothing but a completely evil cesspool would do that.

Title of the posting: How come there are no women in this "all-female" Ghostbusters?

I've read that that this will be an "all-female" Ghostbusters.

I've seen a couple of publicity photos for this film.

In those photos, I did not see a single woman.

All I saw were four or so butt-ugly, monstrous, masculine brutes.

Does it not stand to reason that an "all-female" Ghostbusters should actually have women in it?

Someone messed up there, big-time!

I say that a lot lately because I know this board will be closing soon and I want to remind - so that they never forget - the feminist demon monster scum (that group also includes male darwinists) who spend their lives on earth trying to undermine God's Kingliness, Fatherliness, Masculineness, Maleness, Patriarchness - and yes, they even pretend that He has no Penis - of exactly Who, meaning the Gigantic-Penis-Wielding Sovereign of the Universe - they will be facing when they expire from this earth and then have to account for the King of Kings for all the babies they've murdered while on earth, and other such atrocities.