@shakerofsalts #transphobia

@shakerofsalts #transphobia gettr.com

If women are people with ovaries then trans"women" aren't women.
If women are people who menstruate then trans"women" aren't women.
If women are incubators/breeders/whatever else they come up with, then trans"women" aren't women.

Trans"women" are ejaculators, porn addicted sods, twig-and-berry havers, non-incubators, the non-menstruators, and so on.

They are men.

5 comments

“If women are people” pretty well covers it for me.
Before we get any further, why do YOU get to decide how to define what a woman is or isn’t?

So you don’t get the whole “people who menstruate”, “birthing bodies”, “vagina-havers”, etc, thing, do you? That’s not to describe “women”, that’s because trans men have those qualities but aren’t “women”. They are saying these things don’t make a woman. Therefore trans women are women.

Twig-and-berry-havers?

Wthat the actual fuck? I am absolutely certain I possess no twigs nor berries attached to my body. Same would go for any dicks or gonads. Oddly enough I do have a working womb and can very well be whatever those disgusting terms you used for a pregnant woman. Now, go fuck a rusted nail baseball bat.

@Skide #146434

I’ve always hated the term “breeder”. So icky! Yes I’m bi cis woman, and that means I may end up having sex or being in a relationship with someone who identifies as either a woman or a man, however, I am not a “breeder”. I can’t get pregnant - endo destroyed my uterus - nor do I wish to have kids.

Yuck for that and those others terms as well. And their horrible, limiting definitions of “woman” and “man”. It’s all trying to shove many different shaped and sized pegs into tiny round holes.

So women after menopause aren't actually women?

@shakerofsalts #transphobia gettr.com

5 comments

Confused?