Pedro Afonso #transphobia #enbyphobia #dunning-kruger observador.pt
The strategy behind this social change, which is now intended to be implemented through legislation, is to make people believe that gender ideology is scientifically correct. The theories of this ideology are presented as consensual and indisputable scientific data, but this is absolutely false. Nature has rules, and it is up to science to understand and decode them. Therefore, it is up to science to develop theories that help to reveal reality and not the other way around, as happens in gender ideology: a theory is developed and in order to validate it, it is sought to change reality.
The consequences of this conflict are clear to see. Never before have the minds of children and adolescents been so confused and confused. And this has nothing to do with freedom, but with indoctrination promoted by some parties that have ideologically taken over the State and want to re-educate the masses. In this context, this legislative proposal could not be more tyrannical: parents are expelled from the educational process, psychiatrists and psychologists are completely devalued, their skills being taken away, and minors become the “property” of the State, which, in educational and legislative terms, imposes on them a new system of values based on gender ideology.
It is astonishing to witness such indolence in the face of an ideology that has become entrenched in society as if it were a dogma of faith. But this ideology does not express the truth of the human person. It is, after all, an ideological adventure, inspired by man's desire to control nature; in this case, man has decided to declare war on nature.
In sexual identity, it is not sensible to defend the absolute supremacy of the biological dimension over the psychological/sociocultural dimension. The ideal is for there to be harmony between the two, and it is unethical to provoke artificial psychopathological disorders through the dissemination of a radical ideology aimed at creating a “new man”. I consider it irresponsible for the State to encourage, in any way, the ambiguity of adolescents’ sexual identity, leaving them to fend for themselves, through a frivolous and irresponsible bill.