[Homosexuality is a sin because...]
if god wanted us to be gay, there wouldn't be any women now would there?
77 comments
No women... Wouldn't that be ideal?
Besides, men come from women, so...you'd not exist.
You'd think that fundies, who are so obsessed about men's roles and women's roles being mandated by society, would understand that there can be some specialization in the world. No one's saying that EVERYONE needs to be gay.
#627526
Actually in fundyworld they changed the whole thing, Eve came from Adam. Funny how it works that way. God is so cool. Plus, he's a god and all. And his dick is HUGE. On account of he's god and all.
Do you suppose god is circumcised, or was that rule only for regular fellas and also Jesus? Wouldn't you have hated to be the one in charge of circumcising Jesus? That would have been a lot of pressure.
If God wanted us to have inter-racial marriages, there wouldn't be any white chicks, would there?
[/fundie logic]
Okay, but because there are women, that doesn't mean God intended nobody to be gay. It just means that God didn't intend everybody to be gay. That is if there is a God. Maybe God just wanted everybody to be different?
If god is omnipotent and doesn't want us to be tempted into doing evil things, there wouldn't be a devil, would there? I mean, couldn't he just snap his fingers and make Satan vanish?
And flying is also a sin, otherwise God would have ginen us wings, and curing diseases is a sin, otherwise god wouldn't have made those diseases, and using the internet to communicate instantly over vast distances is a sin, otherwise god would have given us telepathic powers, etc.
@Mr Smith:
Precisely!
(Also, it says nothing about girl-on-girl action in the Bible. Ergo, it's implied that it's okay.)
My plan for world peace is to elect lesbians to all positions of power. The world would be too distracted by the Awesome Lesbian Prime Ministers/Presidents/Whatevers that people would slow down their fighting and the ladies in charge could manage to solve the world's problems.
So if god wanted us to be blue eyed, there wouldn't be any brown eyed people would there.
If god wanted us to be right handed, there wouldn't be any left handed people would there.
Evidence against creation: dogs.
I mean, if god really wanted there to be dogs, there wouldn't be any cats now would there?
I can do assinine syllogisms, me!
A somewhat better one: tigers.
If god wanted lions, there wouldn't be any tigers now would there?
(Because they can interbreed, you see...)
@Torquemada: What's wrong with lesbians?
Personally, I can see only one thing against a lesbian - another lesbian. Oh, wait, I can see two things against- no, three...
So if men don't want to have sex with us, there's no reason for us to exist at all?
We're slightly more than walking vaginas, you misogynist idiot.
If God didn't want the gays to be gay, He wouldn't have made them gay.
Anyway, why oppose homosexuality? It just means less competition for us breeders.
Yes, of course there would. I know that "gay" used to mean male homosexual, but now it has evolved into meaning both male and female homosexuals. (And before that, it meant "happy, go lucky". It's strange to read early Agatha Christie novels, and see her use "pretty and gay" quite easily.)
If God did not want any homosexuals, then he should have refrained from creating some, now wouldn't he?
And I join in the choir saying (singing?) that we women are not only here for male satisfaction.
And according to the Bible, from Adam & Eve's time, including Noah & co. after the 'flood', there was industrial-strength inbreeding going on (which probably accounts for the existence of fundies). Your point?
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
