The mention of unicorns, dragons etc. only reinforces the belief that prior to the Flood, humans and dinosaurs existed together. This is not the stuff of fairy tales...
32 comments
The mention of unicorns, dragons etc. only reinforces the fact that the Bible is a collection of myths, folklore, and propaganda. This is, indeed, the stuff of fairy tales ...
fixed
unicorns, dragons etc.
Yes, it is.
Considering the "unicorns" were, iirc, wild cattle, and the "dragons" were jackals/snakes/sea creatures/etc (the word used has a lot of possible meanings), it's not proof of anything.
And if humans and dinosaurs did live together, we'd see direct physical evidence thereof. Objects made from dinosaur parts, dinosaur bones associated with artifacts, credible drawings of dinosaurs (as opposed to vague/scientifically outdated ones creationists try to pass off), etc. In other words, exactly the sort of things we DO see with prehistoric animals that actually coexisted with humans (such as mammoths).
I thought Unicorns were more like... you know... HORSES?
The nearest you'll get to a dinosaur unicorn is this:image
And... I don't think that looks too much like a horn...
I think this poster is using the same definition of dinosaur as the person who claimed scorpions and lions were dinosaurs...
"Unicorn" = re'em = actually means wild ox
"The mention of unicorns, dragons etc. only reinforces the belief that prior to the Flood, humans and dinosaurs existed together. **This is not the stuff of fairy tales**..."
My poor, poor, Irony Meter...
Confused?
So were we! You can find all of this, and more, on Fundies Say the Darndest Things!
To post a comment, you'll need to Sign in or Register . Making an account also allows you to claim credit for submitting quotes, and to vote on quotes and comments. You don't even need to give us your email address.
