FSTDT

Anonymous #homophobia thecrimson.com

I was talking with a friend yesterday about gay rights when he declared, "discrimination against gays; it's the same as discrimination against Blacks." Opponents of the Reserve Officer Training Corps (ROTC) use the same argument concerning the discriminatory practices of the armed forces. But you cannot compare homosexuals to Blacks. Gays are not a race of people. Discrimination against Blacks is very different from discrimination against gays.

The Black struggle in America has historical basis and implication. Slavery and Jim Crow were practices that raped our families, our identities and our culture. Today, Blacks remain politically and economically oppressed. Poverty and violence have resulted from this systematic oppression. The gains of our ancestors seem to have been temporary.

In contrast, homosexuals are not economically oppressed. As gay rights advocates indicate, they are our lawyers, our doctors, our teachers, etc. Gays represent mainstream America in that they have gained economic freedom and affluence. Politically, many government officials have begun to admit their homosexuality. The struggle of gays is not comparable.
[…]

Rob #fundie thecrimson.com

So. You reveal your true character. Kiss up and kick down. I happen to be a member of a privileged group, but I could not disagree with you more. It does not bother me a bit that a handful of white people can't go to Harvard because a handful of black people are admitted. And you have a very Asian view of what capitalism is. It's a view one small step away from the absolute corruption of supposedly capitalist places like China. We are capitalist. We are also a democracy.

I should have said Chinese. The better minds in America have always tried to soften the rough edges of capitalism to keep it from becoming just the law of the jungle. And we generally disapprove of nepotism and passing through generations of unearned privilege, as well as approve of trying to improve the lives and therefore the entire society by helping those who have faced generations of unearned discrimination.

Walt Longmire #racist thecrimson.com

They have not "worked hard" or "earned it" in any way. Their way is being eased by money, and lots of it. Chinese, in my own experience, are woefully inadequate when it comes to anything except academics, and woefully inadequate in interpersonal communication, so much so that they are like automatons that must be sepearted into a cubiicle where they spend their time finding ways to purloin American technologies to send back to their Communist handlers in China.

Rob #racist thecrimson.com

You don't mind my assumption as long as it's something you can cram and tutor for. That's why many Chinese are less than ideal candidates - they have focused so much on tests and grades that they lack social and other "soft" skills, and often lack creativity. And in your case, empathy. Some valuable skills cannot be reduced to a test, which is only one reason why some subjectivity in admissions is desirable.

Heisenberg #conspiracy thecrimson.com

You make a good point. Israel and Japan are wealthy countries, with demographic replacement problems, that also have a history of oppressing other peoples, but no one is insisting that these countries (or any non-white countries) take in millions of people from the developing world and force blend them with the population. Forced diversity is only for White countries. And if anyone publicly objects to this they have their reputations ruined, lose their jobs, and in Europe are even thrown in prison.

The question is why? The most logical reason is that the world has a group of globalist elites (see Bilderberg group) that sees the white populations as the biggest obstacle to their goal of global government. White people are least likely to accept a system of global sharing. So the program of white genocide is intended to rid the world of the "white problem" by force blending them out of existence. .