www.ufl.facebook.com

Josh Barnhill #racist ufl.facebook.com

Let me point something out to you. In America and Australia we virtually wiped out the natives and had a very peaceable living space (aside from the racial problems with blacks) we did very well for ourselves compared to any other area of the globe.

South Africa was populated by settlers too - much our kinsmen and in a similar manner except they didn't just go in and wipe out the natives they lived there along side of them and to tell you the truth they've had hell for it ever since - if they had wiped out the natives the whites would not be threatened there today - (or in no way such dire straits). Far better to take the land one and all and not dick around and leave your children future conflicts and threats on their prosperity and welfare.

Or I'll just quote the bible: Ezra 9:12

Now therefore give not your daughters unto their sons, neither take their daughters unto your sons, nor seek their peace or their wealth for ever: that ye may be strong, and eat the good of the land, and leave it as an inheritance to your children for ever.

Josh Barnhill #fundie ufl.facebook.com

'am i a troll' lol

I'm a man with a computer. Giving my POV.

Sky-daddy? haha. that's rather blasphemous but I think amusing you actually think of it like that.

Which races are more 'ape-like'?

I'll say the MOST ape-like are the Australoid, and the Negroid races in Africa run a decent second.

If you look at the Cranial Index and Facial Angles they consistently test smaller in both index and facial angle (a physical measurement of intelligence) which is comprised of the x-axis being the ear to the nose and crossing it with the y-axis formed of the line or slope from the chin to the top of the forehead.

Also similar to most primate species the back of the skull hangs outward and is underdeveloped in the bottom whereas the Nordic racial type is pretty much straight with little indention in the back. Yes the skull shapes have differences and one well versed in Physical Anthropology can tell you the racial classification that whatever creature or being that owned that skull had without difficult examination.

Also there are other things you may have noticed and people sometimes draw links to them in popular culture. The fact of big hips/buttox (i dont mean to gravitate this into some kind of sexual / perverted thing) as well as the length of the appendages (legs, arms) in the Negroid race tends to suggest links to primates which often use their "arms" for mobility. Or creatures that are not perfectly bipedal.

Josh Barnhill #fundie ufl.facebook.com

Adam & Eve were White.

That out of Africa bit is nonsense. Even one of the most prolific Physical Anthropologists of the last century stated that: "If Africa was the cradle of mankind, it was only an indifferent kindergarten. Europe and Asia were our principle schools."

These kinds of theories like the 'Out-of-Africa' theory do not change the scientific and biological make up of living organisms. The Aryan Nordic man in Africa is still the Aryan Nordic man and sitting in Ethiopia doesn't make him a Negro. You guys talk the talk with that scientific rhetoric but you don't walk the walk.