@a359

Tom Grauer #pedo #sexist #psycho

Tom Grauer #pedo #sexist #psycho tomgrauer2.home.blog

For his professionalism, dedication, performance, and high-score, Larry Nassar has won the World Championship in Grope and received a gold medal for it, which is considered the most prestigious kind of gold medal due to the immense risks involved in participation in the sport (jail, angry boyfriends, angry fathers, etc.). The sport of Grope is not particularly physically exerting but, being globally recognized as the most dangerous Olympic sport, today many men and even a few women in America celebrate the grandiose achievement of Larry “One Man Grope-ocaust” Nassar.

Nassar’s performance is remarkable all the more due the ages of the grope-receivers he has groped; it is claimed that he “reached levels of hebephilia that were hitherto unheard of.” A score that future contestants would be hard pressed — and hard pressing — to top. Personally, I yearn for the day when grope is legalized, so that I too would be inclined to take part in this great tradition. Let me tell you: when all sex crimes become legal, it’ll only be a matter of time before I’ll “go groping.”

Caamib #sexist #pedo #psycho

Caamib #sexist #pedo #psycho twitter.com

Those opposing incel violence should remember that a) this violence is caused by deprivations no sentient being should feel b) they don't oppose violence against straight white males. To them, these are all lice that must be exterminated.

Your idea rests on the incorrect assumption that "children" (a term which you use even for older teens like those at 17) are somehow inherently incapable of giving consent. It is not so. In the past some girls entered marriage even at 10 years old.

I'm sorry your 13 year-old daughter got ran over and killed, Ms. Smith, but at least no dirty male looked at her ! So rejoice about that, as it is far more important.

Any decent man masturbating must have his fingers broken. Your penis is a weapon. Use it.

I'd beat the living fuck of any woman who claimed to be incel.

If you're wanted by any modern Western woman there is something wrong with you. Only non-consensual sex with modern Western women is right.

If my grandfather opened fire on women in his town during the 1940s they'd be disgusted and scared. Modern Women would be attracted....

Holocaust 21 #psycho #sexist

Holocaust 21 #psycho #sexist holocaust21.wordpress.com

I know I’ve also been guilty in the past of morally supporting violence against certain feminist people who have engaged in particularly horrific violence against others. But that’s really the point I want to make. The global narrative for free speech seems to be that free speech is OK as long as it doesn’t involve advocating violence. But what if the people who you are advocating violence against were the ones who started advocating violence first? And what if the police decide only to arrest one side? Indeed this seems to be largely the case, consider the following examples:

*A man advocating for a feminist woman to be raped is likely to be arrested by the police, we’ve all heard of it happening
*A woman advocating for men to be killed will not be arrested. Even the high profile case of Bahar Mustafa who, despite eventually being arrested after anti-feminist outrage at her comments, was released without charge.

Worse still, what if the other side – the feminist side who the police aren’t arresting – are guilty of not just advocating violence, but actual violence against innocent people? Whereas the side the police are arresting (men) are merely guilty of advocating violence against those who have engaged in real violence? Where is the fairness, where is the justice, in all of that? And when, worse still, it is the police themselves who actively participate in this real violence. Police happily arrest men on ‘fake rape’ charges that they know are false or are likely to be false. They place them in prisons for decades where they are raped and beaten before releasing them onto the ‘Sex Offender Registry’ where the police repeatedly harass them in their homes, place them on a public hit list and prevent them from continuing with their lives.

Get real. The system is sick. The feminist morals are sick and hypocritical. There’s no legitimate non-partisan argument to say it’s wrong to advocate violence against feminists who have engaged in real violence and who, by the way, are currently totally unaccountable except for our ability to say what we think should be done to them in the hope of emotionally persuading enough people to move our justice system towards a fairer more gender-neutral setup.

At the end of the day feminists have engaged in violence and you are morally entitled to state what you think should happen to them, including against any police officers who have also engaged in the brutality. That’s not called a “malicious communication” it’s called “justice”.

Eivind Berge #psycho #sexist

Eivind Berge #psycho #sexist eivindberge.blogspot.com

When men have something women have less of, such as money or power, women simply take it by force. It's called affirmative action and feminists believe it's right. I am not going to argue against that. I accept that as a lost cause. So instead I am going to embrace forced equality and demand it for men as well.

What women have that men don't is of course sex. If anyone doubts that sex is a female resource, go here and request the PDF file Baumeister, R.F. & Vohs, K.D. (2004). Sexual Economics: Sex as Female Resource for Exchange in Heterosexual Interactions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 339-363.

In light of feminism, or if you believe in equality, this article makes such a compelling case for rape that Baumeister felt obliged to include the otiose disclaimer, "Our analysis should in no way be construed as excusing sexual coercion and we roundly condemn any such acts."

So let us give women equality if that's what they really want. Remember that due to the hypergamous nature of women, men get less sex as women get more money and power. Women are generally incapable of feeling attraction for men who are not better than they are, and soon men are no better than equal. So it is about time men in feminist countries such as Norway stop thinking of rape as wrong. I have previously argued this point e.g. here as Arpagus, and no one has been able to justify why affirmative action is right when it benefits women and hurts men but is wrong when it helps men and hurts women.