"Brian, you state you are comfortable stating "I don't know," and you really don't concerning the Almighty, yet if you do not believe in God, and that's your call, you lack peripheral vision, as well as logic."
How the fuck is belief in Gawd or the lack thereof related to peripheral vision!? And lack of logic? It's pretty fucking rich coming from someone who cling to a dogma and won't examine other explanations, despite them making a lot more sense than "Skydaddydidit"...
"You are probably unaware through a lack of observation that certain flowering plants bloom at certain times to feed the various animals. Some flower for the bird's consumption, some for the rabbit, some for the chipmunk and some for the squirrels."
Flowers-eating squirrels? Dafuq!? And save for a few nectar-eating species like the hummingbird, birds are not exactly known to be great flowers-eaters either. Seriously, if you absolutely wanted to use flowers in your example, why didn't you go for bees and other insects that actually use flowers as a primary food source?
Anyway, there is nothing magical or divine about animals evolving to take advantage of an available food source or about plants adapting to attract animals that will fertilize them or spread their seeds. It's all about survival and reproduction, the two motors of evolution...
"Man did not create this natural phenomenon...or have you noticed?"
No shit, Sherlock! If man had created it, it wouldn't be a natural phenomenon... Thankfully, nobody with half a brain claims that.